While qualifying a SAW Procedure as per ASME Sec IX, With respect to QW-404.9, the Flux Trade Name is not an essential variable if the Flux Wire combination is Classified in ASME Sec II Part C (for A No 8, it is essential variable).
My queries are as follows
1. Who will perform the classification test?
2. While reviewing the PQR, does the vendor need to submit Classification records?
3. If a PQR is qualified with Flux Trade Name "X", can this PQR be used to support another WPS where Flux Trade Name "Y" is mentioned without classification? Please note, X & Y are from different manufacturer.
Please let me know your view. If you need further details, let me know.
Thanks and regards
Manas Ghosh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/6b0fedef-fe83-4f74-9e72-110cddda9bae%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? ...
-
Definition of buttering from ASME Section IX, QW/QB-492 Definitions: Buttering: the addition of material, by welding, on one or bot...
-
Section I. PRINT READING 3-1. GENERAL a. Drawings . Drawing or sketching is a universal language used to convey all necessary information to...
No comments:
Post a Comment