Monday, May 11, 2015

[MW:23265] Flux Trade Name for SAW

While qualifying a SAW Procedure as per ASME Sec IX, With respect to QW-404.9, the Flux Trade Name is not an essential variable if the Flux Wire combination is Classified in ASME Sec II Part C (for A No 8, it is essential variable).

My queries are as follows
1. Who will perform the classification test?
2. While reviewing the PQR, does the vendor need to submit Classification records?
3. If a PQR is qualified with Flux Trade Name "X", can this PQR be used to support another WPS where Flux Trade Name "Y" is mentioned without classification? Please note, X & Y are from different manufacturer.

Please let me know your view. If you need further details, let me know.

Thanks and regards
Manas Ghosh

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/6b0fedef-fe83-4f74-9e72-110cddda9bae%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

[MW:35346] Cast-iron welding

Any advice for cast iron welding Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone