Skip to main content

Posts

[MW:36173] Materials & Welding

Dear Experts, If a PQR is qualified using ER70S-2 with impact testing, can we use the same PQR to prepare a WPS using ER70S-6, since both filler metals fall under the same F-Number and A-Number? Would this be acceptable under ASME Section IX, or would a new PQR be required? Your expert opinions and code references would be appreciated. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/4acf9c35-fdfd-4ae8-b59d-ed31182946den%40googlegroups.com .
Recent posts

Re: [MW:36174] Materials & Welding

Acceptable with below note : Ensure A NO  1 is met as Mn and Si are permitted higher  in SFA 5.18 for ER 70S-6  On Sat, 10 Oct 2026 at 7:36 PM, Noble < noblejohny94@gmail.com > wrote: Dear Experts, If a PQR is qualified using ER70S-2 with impact testing, can we use the same PQR to prepare a WPS using ER70S-6, since both filler metals fall under the same F-Number and A-Number? Would this be acceptable under ASME Section IX, or would a new PQR be required? Your expert opinions and code references would be appreciated. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg...

Re: [MW:36175] Materials & Welding

When Impact test is Applicable, according to ASME Sec.IX, change in  AWS classification is an supplementary essential variable and cannot be changed.. Thanks & Regards J.Gerald Jayakumar 0091-8838619635 On Saturday, 10 October 2026 at 07:36:48 pm IST, Noble <noblejohny94@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Experts, If a PQR is qualified using ER70S-2 with impact testing, can we use the same PQR to prepare a WPS using ER70S-6, since both filler metals fall under the same F-Number and A-Number? Would this be acceptable under ASME Section IX, or would a new PQR be required? Your expert opinions and code references would be appreciated. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Material...

Re: [MW:36176] Materials & Welding

Dear Mr Noble, ER 70S-6 in MIG welding consumable and ER 70S-2 is TIG consumable, hence both are different process and new qualification is required.   Regards, Sankaran.SP Coimbatore.  On Saturday, 10 October 2026 at 07:37:05 pm IST, Noble <noblejohny94@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Experts, If a PQR is qualified using ER70S-2 with impact testing, can we use the same PQR to prepare a WPS using ER70S-6, since both filler metals fall under the same F-Number and A-Number? Would this be acceptable under ASME Section IX, or would a new PQR be required? Your expert opinions and code references would be appreciated. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials &...

Re: [MW:36177] Materials & Welding

Dear sir, ER70s-6 available in TIG rod form also. But as you said, a new qualification is required.  Thanks & best regards   N.K.Alagar Chennai On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 6:47 PM 'Sankaran Sp' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote: Dear Mr Noble, ER 70S-6 in MIG welding consumable and ER 70S-2 is TIG consumable, hence both are different process and new qualification is required.   Regards, Sankaran.SP Coimbatore.  On Saturday, 10 October 2026 at 07:37:05 pm IST, Noble < noblejohny94@gmail.com > wrote: ...

[MW:36179] Undercut for welder performance qualification

Dear experts, Undercut acceptance for welder performance qualification, In ASME Sec IX not mentioned any details. So can I take code of construction B31.3 acceptance? -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAEabyKn9%3DnAukOdgz7b1N8ayP6S6pxN0vFmv7iSAtgkD3CtY0Q%40mail.gmail.com .

Re: [MW:36178] Materials & Welding

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/anandhapadmanabha-pillai-m-90613918b_welding-asme-wps-share-7363375429186912260-w0xY/ On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 8:22 AM sri pranav < sripranavweld@gmail.com > wrote: Dear sir, ER70s-6 available in TIG rod form also. But as you said, a new qualification is required.  Thanks & best regards   N.K.Alagar Chennai On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 6:47 PM 'Sankaran Sp' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote: Dear Mr Noble, ER 70S-6 in MIG welding consumable and ER 70S-2 is TIG consumable, hence both are different process and new qualification is required.   ...