Is it acceptable to qualify 2 welders (API 1104 - 6G - one by side) per cupon (down from 8" NPS) or not ?
Is it acceptable to qualify 2 welders (ASME IX - 6G - one by side) per cupon (down from 12" NPS) or not ?
Thank and regards
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:37:56 +0000
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [MW:7943] No of Welders
From: drpaulosejohn@rediffmail.com
Dear Mr. Arun,
Minimum number of welders to be qualified by one WPS is - One welder. The welder who performs the PQR coupen welding is automatically becomes qualified. Please refer 2nd para of QW 301.2 of Section IX:2010 and para 621 of API 1104:2007.
Regards,
Dr. Paulose John
QA/QC Manager,
Unisis Engineering,
Saudi Arabia
.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:15:07 , No ID Specified wrote
To my knowledge there is no limit for number of welder qualification upon one WPS, You can qualify as many as per to the requirement for your project. Here By, P.BalajiRajan, -------Original Message------- Sir, Minimum number of welders to be qualified upon one WPS is mentioned in SEC 1X or API 1104. We are using PIPE,16"X0.375"WT STD SCH API 5L X52 Thanks in advance with regards, Arun S Das |
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment