Hi, If Impact is required by Code then you have to do additional supporting PQR(CVN test only) for G2.
My interpretaion for QW403.5 as follows.
QW403.5: If, however, two or more
qualification records have the same essential and supplementary
essential variables, except that the base metals
are assigned to different Group Numbers within the same
P-Number, then the combination of base metals is also
qualified.
Interpreation: As per the above highlighted sentence,If you have to PQR with CVN test of P1G1 with P1G1 and P1G2 to P1G2,then you can use this for P1G1 with P1G1, P1G2 to P1G2 , and P1G1 to P1G2 also.
In your case you have P1G1(with CVN) PQR only.So you should do additional supporting PQR for G2.
Thanks & Regards,
(Karthik)
Karthikeyan.S QA/QC Manager Getabec Energy Co.,Ltd. 379,Moo6,Soi8,Nikhomphatana, Rayong-21180, Thailand. Phone: 0066 38 897035-8 (Off) Fax: 0066 38 897034 Hand Phone: 0066 892512282
--- On Fri, 10/29/10, Vikas Bhandari <vikas.bhandari349@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Vikas Bhandari <vikas.bhandari349@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MW:7929] Supporting PQR for Impact requirements
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, October 29, 2010, 3:01 PM
Dear all
I could not find the reason to do the CVN test again for new group no. of the same P no. material. Assuming the welding process is SMAW, then as per QW 403.5, " If , however, 2 or more qualification records have same essential and supplementary essential variables, except that the base metals are assigned to different group numbers within the same P number, then the combination of base metal is also qualified" Pls do tell me if that is the not the case, and CVN testing is mandatory (kindly specify the relevant section from the code) On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) <R.Bathula@ticb.com> wrote: Yes, you can, provided all essential/supplementary essential variables are identical to original PQR. Dear All, I have Qualified PQR for welding P1 Gr 1 To P1 Gr 1 with Impact test at (-) 51°C thickness range 2.77 to 11.08 mm. But now we have to weld P1 Gr 1 to P1 Gr 2. Can I do one more supporting PQR with with P1 Gr 1 to P1 Gr 2 With only impact testing. Please clarify whether Tensile test and bend test are mandatory for supporting PQR. --
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
|
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment