Case1 pqr is not suitable for case2 , addition or deletion of filler is essential variable.
2010/10/26 César Alexis Viteri Pérez <alexis_viteri@hotmail.com>
--Dear members,
CASE 1: GTAW , WT QUALIFIED 1/8" – 5/16", WITH FILLER METAL, groove V joint
CASE 2: GTAW, WT 1/16" , NO FILLER METAL , buttweld
Could you please give your opinión regarding this issue:
There is a PQR approved by ASME IX for case 1, is suitable use that PQR for support a new WPS in order to weld as described in case 2?
Thanks and regards
AV
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment