Tuesday, July 22, 2008

[MW:955] RE: 954] CC2235 UT in lieu of RT

Dear Mr. Raghuram,

Beneath RT1, UT to be stamped. (Pl find attached)

Thanks

S.Mathusoothanan
-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
[mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of RAGHAVENDRA
PEMMARAJU
Sent: 22 July, 2008 6:18 AM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:954] CC2235 UT in lieu of RT


Dear Raghuram,

Generally we give marking as RT-1 only with a note in Manufacturer's
data book (MDR) that UT for so and so seams was carried out in lieu of
RT.

regards

rom: Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) <R.Bathula@ticb.com>
Subject: [MW:951] RE: 949] Re: 939] RE: 931] why CC2235-9 is not
applicable for ASMESec.III
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Monday, July 21, 2008, 12:15 PM


Dear Raghavendra
Since you are using CC2235, I have a doubt on Name plate marking as per
UG116 for div 1 vessels. In case when a portion of the vessel RT**ed as
per UW11(a) and the remaining portion UT*ed per CC 2235 in lieu of RT,
what will be the marking, is it RT-1?


From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:
materials-welding@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of raghavendra
pemmaraju
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 7:34 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:949] Re: 939] RE: 931] why CC2235-9 is not applicable for
ASMESec.III


Dear Rohit and Raghuram,
Thanks for the information related to Codes,standards and
Specifications.
Our Organisation has obtained 'N' Stamp from ASME during last year and
once the nuclear treaty is signed between India and USA, we have got
bright chances to get orders for manufacture of Nuclear power related
Equipments from abroad.
As we could successfully replace RT by UT as per CC2235 incase of
Sec.VIII vessels, I want the same trend to continue in case of Sec.III
of ASME as well, which are expected in future. But all nuclear new
construction codes of ASME are strong believers in Radiography. I am
looking for a hint to extend TOFD on nuclear new construction also.
That is why my query related to the same.
Hope I could convey.
regards,
Raghavendra

Larsen & Toubro Limited
www.larsentoubro.com

This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the
intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do
not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it
from your system.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

No comments:

Re: [MW:35289] Welding consumable for S355J2WP material

S355 J2 WP  is a weathering structural steel  It has better atmospheric corrosion resistance. Use E 8018 - W1/W2  Electrodes This is regular...