----- Original Message -----From: sachin sankheSent: Monday, July 14, 2008 7:39 PMSubject: [MW:923] Re: HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPESachin.Sankhe
Hi Shailesh,
This may be special requirement by the Client.
Client may have specify in the piping specification.Also check for any requirement as per NACE MR0175
Also when client specify for hardness, it is always on as welded condition.But get it confirm from client.
Also to control hardness on weld you shall check CE of the material before welding.It shall be less than 0.40% which will offer good weldability.
Regards
Sachin.Sankhe
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 shailesh dave wrote :
>DEAR MEMBERS,
>
>I AM SHAILESH WORKING AS A QA/QC INCHARGE CORE TEAM MEMBER ADGAS, DAS ISLAND. WE ARE WORKING HERE FOR THE FORTHCOMING MAJOR SHUTDOWN.
>
>IN ONE OF THE REPAIR & RECOMANDATION I CAME ACROSS AN INTERESTING CASE.
>
>ONE 20" Sch. 10 SYSTEM HAS COME UNDER SECTIONAL REPLACEMENT. MATERIAL IS SA333 GR.6 ERW PIPE. CLIENT IS ASKING FOR HARDNESS MAX. 200 BHN. ALSO THRE IS NO PWHT INVOLVED IN IT. CLIENT HAS NOT CLARIFIED IF THIS HARDNESS IS AFTER WELDING OR AS RECEIVED MATERIAL. I HAVE REFERED THE ASME SEC. II PART A WHERE SA333 GR.6 DO NOT ASK FOR ANY HARDNESS.
>
>I WANT TO KNOW FROM YOU MEMBERS WHAT IS THE HARDNESS OF SA 333 GR.6 IN AS RECEICED CONDITION. WHAT WOULD BE HARDNESS AFTER WELDING.
>
>REGARDS,
>
>SHAILESH
>
>UAE - DAS ISLAND
>
>
>
>>
Engineer-Inspection
Aker Kvaerner-Malaysia
Mobile:012-2896901
Email1:Sachin.Sankhe@akerkvaerner.com
Email2:Sachin.sankhe@rediffmail.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Monday, July 14, 2008
[MW:925] Re: HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPE
Even 0.4% CE looks on the higher side.
It will be well below the 200BHN, if CE is less than 0.25%.
Pages
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(983)
-
▼
July
(107)
- [MW:888] %RT on nozzle long seam per API650
- [MW:889] RE: 888] %RT on nozzle long seam per API650
- [MW:891] comparison between CP189 and Snt-TC-1A ( ...
- [MW:892] Re: %RT on nozzle long seam per API650
- [MW:893] pre heat for dissimilar metals
- [MW:894] Comparision of UT & RT ( Justifying UT )
- [MW:895] RE: 893] pre heat for dissimilar metals
- [MW:896] Re: 893] pre heat for dissimilar metals
- [MW:897] Re: pre heat for dissimilar metals
- [MW:898] Re: Comparision of UT & RT ( Justifying UT )
- [MW:899] Re: Comparision of UT & RT ( Justifying UT )
- [MW:900] Re: pre heat for dissimilar metals
- Dear Friends, Recently we have come across we...
- [MW:902] Re: 893] pre heat for dissimilar metals
- [MW:903] UG 20(f) - Clarification
- [MW:904] Hardness variation on a temper bead welde...
- [MW:905] Re: Hardness variation on a temper bead w...
- [MW:906] Hardness variation on a temper bead welde...
- [MW:907] Re: Hardness variation on a temper bead w...
- [MW:908] Bolting Materials For ASME & PED
- [MW:909] Re: 885] comparison between CP189 and Snt...
- [MW:910] Re: Hardness variation on a temper bead w...
- [MW:911] Re: Hardness variation on a temper bead w...
- [MW:912] RE: 880] clarification reg root gap
- [MW:913] Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:914] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:915] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:916] Re: 880] clarification reg root gap
- [MW:917] HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPE
- [MW:918] 917] HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPE
- [MW:919] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:920] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:921] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:922] RE: 920] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:923] Re: HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPE
- [MW:925] Re: HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPE
- [MW:924] Re: Welding Baffle Plate on EQ. TEE
- [MW:926] RE: 890] weld distance
- [MW:927] Re: HARDNESS REQUIREMENT FOR SA333GR6 PIPE
- [MW:928] PWHT of SA 333 Gr.3
- [MW:929] Re: PWHT of SA 333 Gr.3
- [MW:930] RE: 928] PWHT of SA 333 Gr.3
- [MW:931] why CC2235-9 is not applicable for ASME S...
- [MW:932] ANSI v/s PN Rating flange - Comparision ...
- [MW:933] PWHT - Caustic service
- [MW:935] RE: 932] ANSI v/s PN Rating flange - Com...
- [MW:934] RE: 932] ANSI v/s PN Rating flange - Com...
- [MW:936] RE: 933] PWHT - Caustic service
- [MW:937] RE: 933] PWHT - Caustic service
- [MW:938] PWHT - Caustic service
- [MW:939] RE: 931] why CC2235-9 is not applicable f...
- [MW:940] RE: 939] RE: 931] why CC2235-9 is not app...
- [MW:941] Flange Reduced Rating
- [MW:942] RE: 941] Flange Reduced Rating
- [MW:943] Re: PWHT - Caustic service
- [MW:944] Suitable electrodes for Duplex Stainless ...
- [MW:945] RE: 944] Suitable electrodes for Duplex S...
- [MW:946] RE: 908] Bolting Materials For ASME & PED
- [MW:947] RE: 865] PED Harmonised Standard for Design
- [MW:949] Re: 939] RE: 931] why CC2235-9 is not app...
- [MW:948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not applicable for AS...
- [MW:950] RE: 948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not applicab...
- [MW:952] RE: 950] RE: 948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not...
- [MW:951] RE: 949] Re: 939] RE: 931] why CC2235-9 i...
- [MW:953] Re: 950] RE: 948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not...
- [MW:954] CC2235 UT in lieu of RT
- [MW:955] RE: 954] CC2235 UT in lieu of RT
- [MW:956] Root under cut
- [MW:957] Re: Root under cut
- [MW:958] UT as per SA-578 & SA-435 (ASME Sec II P...
- [MW:960] Material equivalent software
- [MW:959] Chemical/Mechanical property
- [MW:961] Re: Material equivalent software
- [MW:962] Re: Material equivalent software
- [MW:963] RE: 962] Re: Material equivalent software
- [MW:964] RE: 959] Chemical/Mechanical property
- [MW:965] [piping_valves] Flange Reduced Rating
- [MW:966] RE: 960] Material equivalent software
- [MW:967] Material equivalent software
- [MW:968] SS431#SS 304L
- [MW:969] RE: 947] RE: 865] PED Harmonised Standard...
- [MW:970] Consumable For UNS31254 weldoverlay on SA...
- [MW:971] RE: 970] Consumable For UNS31254 weldover...
- [MW:972] Re: Consumable For UNS31254 weldoverlay o...
- [MW:973] Re: Root under cut
- [MW:974] RE: 971] RE: 970] Consumable For UNS31254...
- [MW:975] RE: 968] SS431#SS 304L
- [MW:976] Re: Root under cut
- [MW:977] Re: Root under cut
- [MW:979] RE: 975] RE: 968] SS431#SS 304L
- [MW:978] RE: 974] RE: 971] RE: 970] Consumable For...
- [MW:980] HAZ
- [MW:981] FW: 978] RE: 974] RE: 971] RE: 970] Consu...
- [MW:982] RE: 981] FW: 978] RE: 974] RE: 971] RE: 9...
- [MW:983] FW: 982] RE: 981] FW: 978] RE: 974] RE: 9...
- [MW:984] RE: 887] RE: 882] alloy steels
- [MW:985] Re: HAZ
- [MW:986] Re: Root under cut
- [MW:987] RE: 985] Re: HAZ
- [MW:988] Re: 985] Re: HAZ
-
▼
July
(107)
|
google.com, pub-7981607153005192, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Search This BlogWikipediaSearch results
Followers |
No comments:
Post a Comment