[MW:967] Material equivalent software

Dear Mr Sachin

We have come out in a long way since past 13 months with nearly 500 members now to help you, me and all of us to enlighten our knowledge in the process, devoting their time. We have debated and decided in the past not to distribute any copyright material (such as codes, standards, company specs etc) in the group. I appreciate time/efforts by the moderators; it is a part of the process, no personnel issues. No more issue on the subject pl. let us stick to the theme of the forum, on sharing technical experience and helping out newbie’s in the industry

Discussion is an exchange of intelligence

Argument is an exchange of ignorance.

I am just pasting here one of the discussions posted by our group member in the past

Dear All,

My advice stands. What you might choose to do within your own company is one thing - I'm sure your company lawyers can help you on matters of copyright. What you post to a world-wide, public group is another. For your information, I am a registered member of this group. If the originators of the group intended it to be a private, internal group, they shouldn't have done it through Google - it's the gateway to the entire world!

I think that this is a very useful forum and a splendid way to share advice and information - just please be careful about copyright issues. The API in particular seems to be very hot on them. If you buy a digital (PDF) version of their specs now, single-user versions are literally that - you'll only be able to install it on one machine and you can only print it once. Which is great if your printer runs out of ink half-way through. I've gone back to buying paper copies.

I do consulting work on various oilfield problems and I teach materials, corrosion and welding matters to M.Sc. students at the Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, where they are VERY sensitive about copyright issues.

Regards to all and keep up the good work!

Owen Jenkins.

From: sachin sankhe [mailto:sachin.sankhe@rediffmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:58 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MW:961] Re: Material equivalent software

Dear Mr.Kanan,

I appreciate your comcern on below matter in your mail
I being in this group wan not knowing the rules & regulation of this group,since I joind this group few month back.
{……………………………………………EDIT……………………………………………………………………………………………..}

You could have explained me in much more positively and in professional manner.

Any ways I am sorry for asking some thing that is against rules & regulation of this group.

Regards
Sachin.Sankhe

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi, You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this. Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime. Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC. The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case). One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example. In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change. Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...

Materials & Welding

Search This Blog