[MW:953] Re: 950] RE: 948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not applicable for ASME Sec.III

RPE,

For transverse flaw sizing, we can use
Option.1 D-Scan for flaw location /
Option.2 MUT on that location
and then please use code case acceptance criteria.

Regards,
Raj

--- On Mon, 7/21/08, Rohit Bafna <rohit@tcreng.com> wrote:

> From: Rohit Bafna <rohit@tcreng.com>
> Subject: [MW:952] RE: 950] RE: 948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not applicable for ASME Sec.III
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Date: Monday, July 21, 2008, 8:55 AM
> Acceptance criteria does not change as per flaw location or
> direction. The
> acceptance criteria is based on size of flaw as per code
> case.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rohit Bafna
>
> Director - Global Sales
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> TCR Engineering Services (India)
> TCR Arabia (KSA), TCR Kuwait
>
> TCR World Inc. (USA)
>
> USA Tel: +1-240-505-0739
>
> India Tel: +91-983-353-0400
>
> <http://www.tcreng.com> www.tcreng.com
> Material Testing | Consulting | Inspection | NDT Services
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Bathula Raghuram
> (Mumbai - PIPING)
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:59 AM
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MW:950] RE: 948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not
> applicable for ASME
> Sec.III
>
>
>
> In my opinion neither code nor CC distinguishes the diff.
> between flaw
> direction longitudinal/transverse (please correct me I am a
> level zero in
> UT), hence your interpretation could be correct.
>
> However Fig2 of CC shows something transverse and
> longitudinal planar flaws
> (could we interpret like that?)
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> raghavendra
> pemmaraju
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 7:52 PM
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MW:948] Re: why CC2235-9 is not applicable for
> ASME Sec.III
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> One more query, this time related to acceptance criteria as
> per ASME
> CodeCase 2235-9.
>
> For the flaws oriented transverse to weld centre line axis,
> what is the
> acceptance criteria as per above CC.
>
> As per me the above CC is silent on this and hence we need
> to apply the same
> acceptance criteria as mentioned in tables 1,2 &3 of
> above CC. What is your
> opinion.!!!!
>
>
>
> regards,
>
> Raghavendra
>
>
> --- On Wed, 7/16/08, raghavendra pemmaraju
> <pemma_raghav@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: raghavendra pemmaraju <pemma_raghav@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [MW:931] why CC2235-9 is not applicable for ASME
> Sec.III
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 10:28 PM
>
>
> We are aware that ASME code case 2235-9 is appliabcle for
> ASME
> Sec.I,Sec.VIII and Sec.XII. Why not the same is applicable
> incase of ASME
> Sec.III. Where as if we see the philosophy of the above
> CodeCase is mainly
> drawn from the nuclear code ASME Sec.XI at the same time.
>
> Can any one comment on the above.
>
>
>
> regards,
>
> Raghavendra
>
> ASNT Level III ( RT,UT & MT) & RSO L-III
>
> Manager,QC
>
> L&T Ltd., Hazira
>
> Surat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---