Skip to main content

[MW:19290] Re: IGC practice E test undertanding

If there is no requirement of your client you can examine at 20X.


Regards,
Ankit Gandhi

On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 16:58:14 UTC+5:30, krishna mudhale wrote:
Dear experts,
As per technical specification of customer says that IGC practice E
for stainless steel SS 316L material shall be carried out and that
bend test specimen shall be examined at a magnification of 200X and
bent specimen shall be free of any cracks or grain dropping.
And we performed this test on coupon and at 20X appearance of fissures
or cracks not observed and IGC E is accepted as per lab report, But at
200X magnification intergranular attack(heavy carbide precepitation)
observed near outer radius of bent specimen and our client is not
accepting this carbide precepation.
So pleare share your views and is it acceptable or not.
--
With Warm Regards
Krishna Mudhale

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

[MW:30043] Weep hole

If weep hole is not provided in dummy pipe before welding What will happen??? -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/da251ee6-fa7f-4851-b876-cdb3834ae341%40googlegroups.com .

Re: [MW:30021] Re: Difference between Control thickness & nominal material thickness ( Para. 331.1.3(c)

The control thickness (nothing but a governing thickness for PWHT)  is defined in para. 331.1.3 (a) shall be used. On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 12:55, atul khatri < atul.mnnit@gmail.com > wrote: No, Exemption on PWHT is based on Nominal thickness not control thickness. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 7:56 PM anhtrangnghieng < anhtrangnghieng@gmail.com > wrote: Dear Gents,  i understand that if control thickness less than 25.4 mm , preheat & PWHT is not required as per Code ?  thank you.  Vào Th 6, 23 thg 8, 2019 vào lúc 15:25 Kannayeram Gnanapandithan < kgpandithan@gmail.com > đã viết: Nominal material Thickness as  Example--- Pressure pipe is supported by another pipe( non pressure part) is being welded, Pressure part pipe thickness is 20mm whereas non pressure part thickness is 10mm,  In this case Nominal material thickness is 20mm. This is my understanding   THANKS & BEST REGARDS, KG.PANDITHAN, BE, IWE,  CSWIP 3.1, ISO 9712 Level 2 in VT, ASNT-Level II in PT,MT,RT & ...