Skip to main content

Re: [MW:13015] Re: 12590] CVN Impact test on 304L 2.77mm thick B31.3 piping

Dear Friends,

I would like to share some points below:-

What about below –425F(-254 Deg.C)?

According to paragraph 323.2.2 (c) we may use austenitic stainless steels below –425F(-254 Deg.C) if we follow the requirements of Table 323.2.2 Column B cell B-4. Unfortunately the requirement of cell B-4 (after the reading of several notes and other paragraphs) requires us to impact test at the minimum design temperature. For liquid helium piping this would mean toughness tests performed at –452F(-269 Deg.C), essentially impossible.

However, the Code does give us some guidance on how to proceed. In Chapter I "Scope and Definitions" there are several paragraphs giving us direction. These paragraphs are included in Section 300 (b) "Responsibilities" and 300 (c) "Intent of the Code". A reading of these paragraphs, in our opinion, gives the owner, designer and manufacturer some latitude in this situation, where the Code doesn't prohibit the use of these materials but the testing requirements are not physically possible to perform. In these situations, we have recommended to the owner that good engineering practice would be to apply the requirements of a more restrictive Code, namely the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division I to this situation. Part UHA "Requirements for Pressure Vessels Constructed of High Alloy Steel", specifically paragraph UHA-51, addresses Impact Tests (e.g. Toughness Tests). The rules for austenitic stainless steels in this situation are summarized below.

  1. For MDMT below –320F (-196C) impact tests are REQUIRED of all raw material, weld procedure qualifications for both the weld and heat affected zone for each type of weld process, and production weld test specimens (weld and heat affected zone) for each type of weld process.
  2. Impact tests may be Charpy Tests performed at –320F (–196C) only if Type 316L weld filler metal is used (and measured to have a Ferrite Number no greater than 5). THESE TESTS ARE PERFORMED AT –320F REGARDLESS OF THE ACTUAL LOWER DESIGN TEMPERATURE. Otherwise, testing using ASTM E 1820 JIC method at the minimum design metal temperature must be used.
  3. UHA-51(g) exempts the impact test requirements above due to low stress. Where vessels that have a coincident ratio of design stress in tension to allowable stress of less than 0.35, impact test of materials and weld procedures and production welds is NOT required.

Thanks & Regards
Amit Pahuja
Sr. Welding Engineer
B-Tech(Welding), IWE-IIW
CSWIP-3.1, NDT Level-II
BOIST-OFFSHORE,



On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:44 AM, AMIT PAHUJA <amitpahuja2@gmail.com> wrote:
The impact tests are not required when the shape/size/thickness of the
element does not allow machining a charpy specimen.
As max OD is 60.3mm and the thick2.77mm. These two combined size
constraint (thickness & radious of curvature) does not allow machining
the charpy specimen in the tube.

To perform impact test it shall be necessary to weld thicker material,
in this case welding energy will not be representative of weld .

Base material TP304L,welded with dedicated filler ER308L.by TIG
process.My experience this configration gives confident good weld
toughness garentees good result,no risk of embrittlement at cryogenic
temprature.

Amit Pahuja
Sr. Welding Engineer
B-Tech Welding, IWE/EWE-IIW,
cswip-3.1, NDT Level-II

On Oct 1, 6:48 pm, "pgoswami" <pgosw...@quickclic.net> wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> ASTM A-370,or ASME SA-370  allows impact test on subside specimens.If you
> look at Fig-12, A/SA-370 the smallest allowable thickness is 2.5 mm.Table-9
> provides the acceptance criteria for various sub size specimens.
>
> You client is right , minus(-) 269 deg C is the ultimate for any material.
> Although austenitic S.S is generally though to have sufficient DBTT values
> at this temperature, it's better to prove the same, during fabrication.
>
> B-31.3 concerns are generic, it specifies that impact is not required if the
> width at the notch is less than 2.5 mm.But the discussion of B-31.3 does not
> address such low MDMT as -269 Deg C.
>
> If  you have the Mill supplied MTR TESTED AT -269 DEG c ? and the MTR of
> welding consumables impact tested @ -269 Deg C, then your client may have
> some backup document for acceptance.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.IWE
> Welding & Metallurgical Specialist & Consultant
> Ontario,Canada.
> Email-pgosw...@sympatico.ca,
> pgosw...@quickclic.net
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [
>
> <mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
> mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:05 PM
> To: Materials & Welding
> Subject: [MW:12590] CVN Impact test on 304L 2.77mm thick B31.3 piping
>
> Please I need your assistance:-
>
> I have Helium gas Pipeline 304L to be welded by ER308L ,having MDMT at -269
> Degree Centigrade , but the thickness of my Pipe is 2.77mm , Which is
> exempted from the impact requirements from B31.3 Chapter-III, Table323.2.2
> Column B, B-4, Notes -6, Impact test are not required when maximum
> obtainable charpy specimen has a width along the notch of less than 2.5mm.
> but my client is not ready to accept that condition/constraint of B31.3. he
> needs explanation that How the material thickness(2.5mm) will bear that MDMT
> at -269 Degree Centigrad., even Obtainable charpy specimen is not possible,
> but How to convince the client the material will have the properties at that
> temperature.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Posting on behalf of: Amit Pahuja
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group's bolg at
> <http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/>http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
> The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
> meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
> w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...