[MW:1605] Re: 1599] Re: Pneumatic test of Reinforcement Pad for Branch connection in Piping

Mr. Boss

 

Ur not agree with then but what u said i think its totally not acceptable how can u found leak if ur going to conduct RT. Just i want to know how can u said like tht to change the fitter, welder and welding inspector.

 

May be u have any experience in RF pad test? But in my knowledge we are doing the RF pad leak test to come to know there is any leak in stub-in or not.

 

Best Regards
 

Nishit Kumar

Piping Engineer

Benzene Xylene Toluene Unit (BTX) Project, Philippine

Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd.(S. Korea)

 

Please don't print this Email unless you really need to - this will preserve trees on planet earth.

---

From: Rituraj Bose <boser2006@gmail.com>
To: Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:53:29 PM
Subject: [MW:1603] Re: 1599] Re: Pneumatic test of Reinforcement Pad for Branch connection in Piping


I don't agree with both the reply. RP wrote that it is mandatory
otherwise how we can understand the leakage? If code or client's spec
doesn't require leak test, why we have to do? Of course it is better
to do. Like better to do 100% RT, but in case of 10% requirement, we
accept balance 90% on the basis of 10%. Same way code considers that
the welding between run and branch pipes are OK. More over leaks may
be also from vent holes.
SS wrote that during hydrotest of main line, we can also find leakage
in RF pad. I think this is completely wrong, otherwise we have to
change the fitter, welder and welding inspector immediately.

Regards,
R. Bose

On Feb 19, 6:16 am, "S SIVASUBRAMANIAN" <s...@lntkuwait.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Jivan Dhamane,
>
> As per ASME B31.3 Pneumatic test of RF pad is not mandatory, if there is any
> defect in RF Pad weld, during hydrotest of the main line you can find out
> because of the Hydrostatic pressure in main line.
>
> With regards,
>
> S. SIVASUBRAMANIAN
>
> QA/QC Manager
>
> Larsen & Toubro Kuwait Construction Company
>
> P.O. Box.1082, Fintas 51011, KUWAIT
>
> Mobile: 00965 66387188, 00965 94005327
>
> Fax: 00965 66321511
>
>   _____  
>
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ramprasad Chari
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:55 AM
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MW:1599] Re: Pneumatic test of Reinforcement Pad for Branch
> connection in Piping
>
> Irrespective of, whether it is mentioned in code or not RF pad has to be
> pneumatically tested otherwise how will you check leakage in "welds"
> associated with RF pad.
>
> Regards
>
> Aarpee
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jivan Dhamane <jivanadham...@yahoo.co.in>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Friends
>
> I would like to know whether Pneumatic Test of Reinforcement Pad for branch
> connection of Process Piping is mandatory as per ASME B31.3. I searhed but I
> could not found any paragraph in ASME B31.3.
>
> Regards
>
> Jivan Dhamane
>
>   _____  
>
> Cricket on your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter now!
> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_cricket_1/*http:/beta.cricket.yahoo.com>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---