Skip to main content

[MW:1577] Re: 1565] A good suggestion from a member

Dear Mr. Patel,

My intentions was not to hurt any body. With due respect to the
experience members are sharing, I just want to tell that no personal
experience is approved to resolve one code issue. Members should
clearly tell that this is their suggestion only. I hope you have
already noticed that some mails insists to do things as they have
done, without any code supports.

Regards,
R. Bose

On Feb 12, 2:50 pm, "Patel, Jatin (London)"
<Jatin.Pa...@WorleyParsons.com> wrote:
> Dear all members,
>
> Definitely I agree with Mr. Bose and Mr. Raghuram as you all will agree
> that this group has grown beyond expectations and performing
> exceptionallly well as judged by very high and prompt flow of emails. I
> have seen many of the groups that have last e-mails posted in year 2005
> or 2006. I am quite impressed of the enthusiasm and eagerness of the
> participants, probably because we are all like minded and understand
> each other very well in few words.
>
> Having said that it is imperative to have accuracy and focus on our word
> power. More precise answer avoids at minimum, two communications ie.
> re-question and re-answer. For example, quoting ASME B 31.3 alone and
> quoting ASME B 31.3 para 323.2.1 (e) has great influence on readers and
> participants. Imagine 400 members reading two extra emails and spent
> atleast 3 minutes on each! Also few people like me have habbit of book
> marking (flag) incomplete answers and keep it in Inbox awaiting final
> answer and thereby leaving Inbox occupied.
>
> As far as personal feeling like "I think......", "May be......", "I/we
> have done......" etc. are concerned, I do not see great problem here as
> memebers have different level of experience and therefore can not
> generalise their own statement. More experienced people can definitely
> put up authentic and strong opinions. As idea of this group is to
> encourage and mentor younger and less experienced community to allow
> them stand globally, we should be reasonably tolerant to this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards,
>
> Jatin Patel
>
> Worley Parsons, London, Piping Materials
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bathula
> Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING)
> Sent: 12 February 2009 10:55
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [MW:1565] A good suggestion from a member
>
> More suggestions are welcome to improve the quality of postings.
>
> Always read/review your posting before hitting the send button.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Bose Rituraj (LD5 Site)
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:21 PM
> To: Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING)
> Subject: Related to materials and welding group
>
> Dear Raghuram,
>
> Thanks that Materials and Welding are going well! I have to comments,
> where you can help to direct the members.
>
> 1.      Though you have tried, but still people are replying in such a
> way that we have to unnecessary scroll down a lot. Some time it is
> boring to read same thing again and again.
> 2.      Some replies are not proper with author's personal feeling like
> "I think......", "May be......", "I/we have done......" etc. Please
> instruct the members to be specific and must be related to standards or
> codes. Even some members are referring some codes without reading it and
> obviously the specific clause is missing in their mails.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> R. Bose
>
> *** WORLEYPARSONS GROUP NOTICE ***
> "This email is confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose  or  use the  information contained in it.  If you have received this email in error,  please notify us immediately by return email and delete the email and any attachments. Any personal views or opinions expressed by the writer may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any company in the WorleyParsons Group of Companies."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...

Re: [MW:10788] ON PLOT PIPING & OFF PLOT PIPING

Piping systems involved for the flow lines and gathering lines from the well head isolation valve to the production facility or processing plant isolation valve are determined as OFF PLOT. ON PLOT defines piping system in the processing plant and production platform. ANSI/ASME B31.4 applies for off plot piping system. B31.4 allows the use of either API 1104 or ASME section IX (as appropriate). However, occasionally, a very small system such as piping within 500 feet of a processing plant (some client also said 400 feet) may be declared B31.3 rather than B31.4. When B31.3 is invoked, only ASME Section IX is used. before you decide which code to use for welding procedure and/or welder qualification for pipe welding, you have to know the design and construction code applicable to the system. Please read far enough into scope and diagram illustrating the application of either B31.3 and B31.4 hope this helps rgds 2011/4/21 pradip kumar sil < pradipsil@gmail.com > Dear all, ...