[MW:3342] Re: ACCEPTANCE OF ROUNDED INDICATION BY VISUALL INSPECTION

Dear Asad Azmi

As per ASME SEC VIII DIV 1.Visually welds shall be free from cracks,
pinholes & incomplete fusion
Visually it is not accepatable

Regards
Adi

On Sep 28, 10:35 am, asad azmi <azmiasada...@gmail.com> wrote:
> GOODMORNING...........
>
> can anybody can confirm  whether a pin hole of diameter 3mm and depth of
> approximately 5 mm in fillet weld  of 6mm of material SA 516GR 70  can
> be *VISUALLY
> accepted.* The vessel is fabricated as per ASME SEC VIII DIV 1.
>
> *If YES then by which code. *
> **
> Kindly note that if we consider acceptance crieteria  for PT/MT, as per ASME
> SEC VIII DIV 1, APPENDIX 6/8, Rounded indication upto 4.8mm is acceptable.
>
> *can the above defect can be accepted on the basis of acceptance crieteria
> of PT/MT.*
> **
> **
> please reply ASAP.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Asad Azmi
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Adi <adinr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If joint repair came in 2" pipe, it is very difficult to identify
> > repair the exact location & root repair we can't do, so the joint
> > should be cut out
> > My question is When we are calculating the welders repair %  we have
> > to consider total length of 2" is repair ? Why because we repaired the
> > total length
> > Is it correct please advice
>
> > Adi- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---