[MW:3316] Re: Welder reapir %

Dear Adi,

The discussion what we had is just our ideas; ultimately, your Quality
System should have those definitions and you should follow as per that
only not per our statment. Please see my points below (Ans)

Thanks
Senthil

On Sep 25, 9:56 am, Adi N Rao <adinr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank Q to all
>
> If I calculate full cut out (especially for 2") The repair % is coming too
> much
>
> Exp: 10 joints 1 joints repair means 10%repair rate
>
> However the repair portion is very small, I have to cut the joint
>
> Observed welder repair rate above 5%, he should be taken off the job and
> sent for re-training for a week.. ok

Ans: If your system defines as you said, yes we you have to send him
for retraining

>
> After requalification his repair % calculation start from fresh or from the
> old ?

Ans: Fresh only

>
> Adi
>
> On 9/25/09, Shashank Vagal <nach_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >   Hi, Whatever amount of repair was caused by the welder and no. of joints
> > repaired should be attributed fully to him. Indication type etc are
> > immaterial, it is the bad workmanship that we are considering. And
> > indication is repairable if it is a defect (not acceptable), right?
> > Indicates bad workmanship. Accordingly it needs to be treated. But a record
> > can be kept of % length repaired, just for comparison. Otherwise, it is for
> > the % repair rate per joint that a welder's record should be maintained.
> > Just for your info, If the repair rate shows sign of exceeding 1.5%, the
> > welding supervisor should take cognizance. If it is >3%, the welder should
> > be warned officially. Above 5%, he should be taken off the job and sent for
> > re-training for a week. These are the general norms in the welding world in
> > the industry. Or, so my notes say.
> >  Shashank Vagal
>
> > --- On *Thu, 24/9/09, MNS <mn.senthilku...@ymail.com>* wrote:
>
> > From: MNS <mn.senthilku...@ymail.com>
> > Subject: [MW:3303] Re: Welder reapir %
> > To: "Materials & Welding" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Thursday, 24 September, 2009, 5:49 PM
>
> > If it is cut and reweld, 100% repair to be considered for quality
> > costing; but, for welder performance, the actual repair/defect % only
> > to be considered - this is just a thought....
>
> > Thanks
> > Senthil
>
> > On Sep 24, 3:35 pm, Adi <adinr...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=adinr...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > > If joint repair came in 2" pipe, it is very difficult to identify
> > > repair the exact location & root repair we can't do, so the joint
> > > should be cut out
> > > My question is When we are calculating the welders repair %  we have
> > > to consider total length of 2" is repair ? Why because we repaired the
> > > total length
> > > Is it correct please advice
>
> > > Adi
>
> > ------------------------------
> > Yahoo! India has a new look. Take a sneak peek<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_metro_2/*http://in.yahoo.com/trynew>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> S.Adinarayanarao
> QA/QC
> SEPOC
> TC-8112- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---