Skip to main content

Re: [MW:15071] 14919] Stress relieving Rejected for 5 min less soaking time.

That is for Impact test, as john said it is rejected and do it again
pandithan

On 8/7/12, sachin sankhe <sachin.sankhe@rediffmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Friends
> ASME SEC IX gives relaxation on soaking time i.e atleast 80% of that
> required on production joint
> RegardsSachin.Sankhe
>
>
>
>
> From: "pgoswami" &lt;pgoswami@quickclic.net&gt;
> Sent: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:44:39
> To: &lt;materials-welding@googlegroups.com&gt;
> Subject: Re: [MW:14949] 14919] Stress relieving Rejected for 5 min less
> soaking time.
>
>
>
>
>
> Harish/Mohd,
> &nbsp;
> I am not trying to act as moderator.
>
> &nbsp;
> Looking at the problem, a separate simulation may be as
> time consuming as the original HT. Code is a law, with engineering
> judgments.
> Hence the inspector has the rights to declare that the original HT was
> inadequate. The simplest solution what looks to me is to perform additional
> SR
> for 15-20 mins and satisfy code requirements.
> &nbsp;
> PWHT time is all cumulative , and there no restriction
> form ASME code.
> &nbsp;
> Thanks.
> &nbsp;
>
>
>
>
>
> Pradip
> Goswami,P.Eng.IWE
> Welding
> &amp; Metallurgical Specialist
> Ontario,
> Canada.
> Email-pgoswami@sympatico.ca,
> pgoswami@quickclic.net
> &nbsp;
>
>
>
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Harish
> Kannepalli
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 11:58 AM
> To:
> materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [MW:14942] RE: 14919]
> Stress relieving Rejected for 5 min less soaking time.
>
>
>
> You can propose the following to your client:
> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Perform Simulation on separate
> coupon, check the mechanical &amp; metallurgical properties. If they meet
> the
> code requirements, it may be acceptable. After all, code is made by humans
> for
> humans.
>
>
> 2012/7/23 John Henning &lt;jhenning@deltak.com&gt;
>
>
>
>
> Most
> common materials require 1 hour/25mm or 60minutes/25mm and I assume you
> are
> working with one of these materials.&nbsp; Then, for a 40mm thick material
> the
> required minimum soak time is (40mm)*(60min.)/(25mm) = 96
> minutes
> &nbsp;
> You
> don't meet Code required minimum soak time.&nbsp; Your soak time must
> exceed
> the minimum time.&nbsp; Therefore, your pipe weld is unacceptable.&nbsp;
> No
> discussion – it is clearly unacceptable in its present
> condition.
> &nbsp;
>
> John
> A. Henning
> Welding
> &amp; Materials
> &nbsp;
>
> From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> mohd
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 1:52 AM
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> Subject:
> [MW:14919] Stress relieving Rejected for 5 min less soaking
> time.
> &nbsp;
> Dear expert,
>
> &nbsp;
>
> As per ASME 8-1-UCS-56
>
> &nbsp;
>
> We have done SR for our 40mm thk-30" pipe
> joint.
>
> &nbsp;
>
> but unfortunetly, soaking time was just short by 5min.Now
> our client/PMC both are not agree to release.
>
> &nbsp;
>
> Required time : 1hr.15min
>
> Actual Time : 1hr.10min
>
> &nbsp;
>
> It is acceptable OR could you share any technical view
> to&nbsp;convince&nbsp;client?
>
> &nbsp;
>
> regards,
>
> mohd.
> --
> To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from
> this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more
> options, visit this group's bolg at
> http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
> The views
> expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for
>
> educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t.
> applicable code/standard/contract
>
> documents.______________________________________________________________________
> The
> information in this email is confidential, and is intended solely for the
>
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this email please
> let
> us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy
> this
> message or disclose its contents to anyone. The internet can not guarantee
> the
> integrity of this message. HAMON (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
> therefore be liable for the message if
> modified.
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from
> this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more
> options, visit this group's bolg at
> http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
> The views
> expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for
>
> educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t.
> applicable code/standard/contract
> documents.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> regards,
> Harish.
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to
> materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email
> to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit
> this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
> The
> views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant
> for
> educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t.
> applicable
> code/standard/contract documents.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>
> For more options, visit this group's bolg at
> http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
>
> The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
> meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
> w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group's bolg at
> http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
> http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
>
> The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
> meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
> w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
>
>
>

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm

The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...