Dear Prem
Depending on whether you have applied full or spot radiography, interpretation has to be carried out as per UW-51 or UW-52 of the ASME VIII div 1.
This means that only elongated inclusions of 6mm and larger needs to be repaired for the applied material thickness of 16mm.
Therefore this indication is acceptable.
Technically spoken, a tungsten inclusion is a round defect, which cannot cause cracks in the weld.
Regards
Depending on whether you have applied full or spot radiography, interpretation has to be carried out as per UW-51 or UW-52 of the ASME VIII div 1.
This means that only elongated inclusions of 6mm and larger needs to be repaired for the applied material thickness of 16mm.
Therefore this indication is acceptable.
Technically spoken, a tungsten inclusion is a round defect, which cannot cause cracks in the weld.
Regards
Fred Bosman tel 055-3604488 mobiel 06-83632297Op 9-8-2012 17:54, prem nautiyal schreef:
Met vriendelijke groeten
Fred Bosman
tel 055-3604488
mobiel 06-83632297
--
Dear FriendsAfter reviewing a RT film of a Circ.seam joint (16mm thk), which has been welded with TIG + SMAW, i have observed a tungsten inclusion @2-3mm in dia.The construction code of the vessel is ASME Sec VIII Div.1No doubt this tungsten inclusion is a defect, but i would like to know whether there is any acceptance criteria related to diameter for the same in ASME Sec VIII Div.1. Please give Code reference.RegardsPrem NautiyalCell: 9769316004
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment