Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Re: [MW:18293] Re: Cooling rate for 310S material after PWHT

It is not a stablilized steel but is suited for service in the sensitization temperature range because of its high chromium content. With the allowed chemistry, 310S would have enough chromium to prevent rusting even if all the carbon gets precipitated as chromium carbide (the main cause of sensitization). 

As mentioned, we have used SS 310S extensively for chemical reactors which work in the temperature range of 500 - 900 C. No PWHT was ever needed or used. 

Swamy
 

On Monday, July 29, 2013 4:54:28 PM UTC+5:30, kannayeram gnanapandithan wrote:
SS310S is not a stabilized steel, in ASS only 321,347 &348 , some time 316Ti

Pandithan
Welding Consultant


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Pierre Benzoni <fishf...@aol.com> wrote:
I'm reading what both groups are saying and the quick solution should with all High Chromium and Nickel would be to cool with at a quick rate. If not the chrome and nickel burn. My first move while metal is hot would be to hand brush with a SS Hand brush. Once brushed and any burned nickle is removed, use a spray bottle with demineralized water and mist the welds to as a aid in cooling process. Just saved you from running a PQR.

 Signed very experanced 
Union pipefitter welder 
of 32 years of Local 9



Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 26, 2013, at 8:14 AM, SV Swamy <svs...@gmail.com> wrote:

310S is a highly stabilized grade with Chromium and Nickel content of about 22% and carbon content of about 0.1% (I am writing now from memory). Even if the chromium carbide precipitation takes place because of slow cooling rate, there would still be adequate chromium to ensure that the steel remains stainless (>14%). So, the cooling rate is not critical. However water cooling is not advisable because it can introduce distortion and residual stresses. We have in fact used 310S vessels in the service temperature range of 500 - 900 C very successfully for many years. 

I would suggest that you use chilled air or chilled argon (if the extra expense is not an issue) to minimize the distortion and also provide a fast cooling rate. 

If you need any more clarifications, pl. feel to write. 

Regards

Swamy
Retired QA/QA Manager (Metallurgist)
Nuclear Fuel Complex, Dept. of Atomic Energy
Hyderabad, India 

On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:39:52 PM UTC+5:30, Marc Vleminckx wrote:
We are building a 310S vessel, 22mm thick, that needs solution annealing. Within our organisation there are some questions about the cooling rate this vessel needs.
ASME II SA-480 only say's the material needs to be quenched in water or rapidly cooled by other means. 
Somebody mentioned the temperature should drop from 1040°C to 427°C within 15 minutes to guarantee material requirements. Because of the design of the vessel and possible difficulty to maintain an equal cooling rate along the surface the choice was made to cool with forced air. To some of us a 600°C temp. drop with forced air in 15min is nearly impossible with forced air. So the main questions are "What is the definition of rapidly?", "Are there other means to reach this cooling rate?" and "Is there somebody who can provide this service within Holland or maybe Germany?". Heating rate is between 150 and 200°C/h starting from 482°C, and holding time 1h at 1040°C.

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

No comments:

[MW:34920] Tubesheet Hole step

Hello Team, I have one question any tolerance given for tubesheet Hole step. Please do needful. Regards, AP  -- https://materials-...