Sunday, September 26, 2010

[MW:7203] Re: effect of longer holding time during hydrotest

Dear Asad,

The time required for hydrotesting of any equipment is mostly based on
the complexity of its construction. You can say that its the time
required for a sign of leakage or seepage to take visual effect. So
the more complex the equipment is, the longer should the time be
extended.
Furthermore, if you are having a sufficiently weak member in the
system, the exposure time should be enough to allow that member to
leak or crack etc.
For equipment sound enough, no impact on the physical properties & in
a nutshell, the time should be up to the satisfaction of the
inspector.

Regards,

Muhammad Ali


On Sep 26, 10:06 am, asad azmi <azmiasada...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Goodday.
>
> On what basis holding duration (eg.1 hour, 2hour etc) of hydrotest is
> decided.
>
> What will be the effect on mechanical proerty of material if the holding
> period exceeds than as required by design.
>
> eg. suppose for a particular hydrotest  holding period is 2 hours and actual
> holding period exceeds to 3 hours. what will be the effect on mechanical
> proerty.
>
> Thanks in advance for your valuable suggestions.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Asad Azmi

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35289] Welding consumable for S355J2WP material

S355 J2 WP  is a weathering structural steel  It has better atmospheric corrosion resistance. Use E 8018 - W1/W2  Electrodes This is regular...