Monday, January 18, 2010

Re: [MW:4066] Transition (pup pipes) testing requirments

specifications do not adress this clearly. in my view you should always test as per linepipe spec for anything formed into a pipe whether it be from a forging, plate or API 5L linepipe. in reality though they are often treat as assemblies omiting additional fracture control for linepipe
 
SKumar

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Paul Jevons <pjevons@gmail.com> wrote:
Pipelines are subject to the rigours of fracture control e.g. ductile
fracture via impact energy absorption and brittle fracture via shear
area fracture appearance. This is often done by CVN and DWT.

Should pup pieces made up from API 5L xx linepipe be subjected to the
same tests? Or should they by tested only via impact energy absorption
as are the fittings to which they are attached.

PJ

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.


No comments:

Re: [MW:35289] Welding consumable for S355J2WP material

S355 J2 WP  is a weathering structural steel  It has better atmospheric corrosion resistance. Use E 8018 - W1/W2  Electrodes This is regular...