Skip to main content

Re: [MW:25603] Comparison for FCAW & GMAW

By Materials & Welding
GMAW is prone to lack of fusion



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

-------- Original message --------
From: Kannayeram Gnanapandithan <kgpandithan@gmail.com>
Date: 26/10/2016 09:17 (GMT+02:00)
To: materials-welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MW:25602] Comparison for FCAW & GMAW

it is better to go with FCAW because consumable is suitable for all position welding

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, IWE,  AWS-CWI, CSWIP 3.1,
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY
Mobile no: +919940739349

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Lakshman Kumar. B <lakshmankumar4@gmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (lakshmankumar4@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Hi friends,

 

We have a big pipe line job in water segment.

We are planning to implement FCAW or GMAW technique to expedite the welding activity…

Please suggest me that which technique is most favorable for IS2062 material (equivalent to Pno 1) at site for 5G or 6G position…..

Your detail explanation will be more helpful on selecting the process….

Also in terms of cost – which will be economical for the project ….

 

Thanks & Regards,

Lakshman Kumar B,

Project Manager.

 

Navayuga Engineering Company LTD

Corp Off: Plot no 379, Road No 10,

Jubileehills, Hyderabad.500033 India.

Tel -  +91 -40-2333 9990/91/92 – Ext 398

Fax: +91-40-2333 7789

Mob - +91 9440031459.

Email –lakshmankumarb@navayuga.com

http://www.necltd.com/

 

--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/003601d22f41%241a710580%244f531080%24%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJzm4ePw3gXNgxXZntjZ_wkY5Z4yiAvZvUOHb4YQbRSBnktNWQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

By Materials & Welding
Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Materails FAQs

By Materials & Welding
Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...
21 comments
Read more

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

By Materials & Welding
Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...
Post a Comment
Read more