Monday, October 21, 2013

[MW:19028] Re: 19018] Hardness Value

Dear Herman

Thanks for your reply now i am clear....

Best Regards
Krish

On Monday, October 21, 2013 4:26:10 PM UTC+5:30, hpi001 wrote:

Dear Krish,

 

In general you will find higher hardness values with HV5 method compared to HV10 because smaller part of the microstructure is measured. Therefore if hardened structures like martensitic and/or bainitic are present in the Coarse grain area / heat affected zone you will have the risk that a measurement is executed on a hardened structure only in case of HV5 where HV10 measures a larger area by which the maximum hardness measured will become a little bit lower.

Therefore you can accept HV5 measurements without any doubts if they are below the required 325 HV.

 

Met vriendelijke groeten / Best Regards,

 

Herman Pieper

QA-QC Inspector / IWI-C Welding Inspector / IWT / Materials Expert

 

Logo nieuw klein

Job van der Havestraat 6

8384 DB, Wilhelminaoord

Cell: +31 6 51691215

 

Van: material...@googlegroups.com [mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] Namens Krish QA
Verzonden: maandag 21 oktober 2013 11:06
Aan: material...@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: [MW:19018] Hardness Value

 

Dear Experts

our project specification requirement for hardness of structural tubular is 325 HV10 (Maximum) But the manufacturer provided test certificate of 325 HV5 (Maximum) and all the values found below 325.

1.    Is it Acceptable HV5 in the place of HV10?

2.    Is there any conversion method to conversion method to convert HV5 to HV10?

Thanks & Regards

Krish

 

--
To post to this group, send email to
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35354] Cast-iron welding

1. Preheat joint area(other area, cover with mineral wool). 2. ENiCi or ENiFe-CI. 3. stringer bead. 4. peening is to be done on weldmetal im...