Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from January, 2011

RE: [MW:9609] heat input calculation in welding

From an ASME Section IX Code stand point the below statements are not correct.   On should read the Section IX, QW-409.1, interpretations (there are quite a few).  In particular one should Interpretation IX-81-91.  However, I will transcribe portions of several interpretations that are interesting:   IX-81-19 Q4 – “If QW-409.1 does not require that average heat input be determined” {previous question – reply No} “how is heat input established for multiple pass procedure qualification?  Must it be established for each pass? R4 – QW-409.1 requires requalification when an increase in heat input occurs over that qualified.  Maximum heat input is established during procedure qualification by determination of the maximum amperage and voltage in combination with the least travel speed or, alternatively, the maxi mum volume of weld metal deposited per unit length of weld.  Heat input is not required to be determined for each...

Re: [MW:9613] Expiry period for SMAW consumable-reg

Hi, There is no code specify the shelf life of electrode, its depends on the manufacturer recommendation. I had also faced the problem with Lincoln electrodes certificates, as they mention in the lot certificates in 1 year. So raised the quarry in Lincoln Company about the shelf life of electrode; accordingly they send the warranty/validity certificate (Here I attached the attached warranty/validity certificates & lot certificates -for your information) So when ever you face the shelf life problem with electrode kindly contact the manufacturer and get the validity confirmation from the company. its the only record or proof of electrode shelf life and solution. Rgs, Sambath Kumar On 1/31/11, Ilangkumaran Kumarasamy < ilangkumaran.kumarasamy@borouge.com > wrote: > Dear Mr Pradip, > > Yes your statement is perfectly correct. > > Thank you, > Ilangkumaran > > From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com > [mailto: materials-welding...

Re: [MW:9614] Electrode/Filler wire for Grade 4Q casting

Dear Mr.Siva, It is a low alloy steel. You can use Cromotherme1 of D&H. Regards, C.Muniyandi Coimbatore On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Innovative Engineering Products < iepsrp@gmail.com > wrote: Dear all,   Please let me know the welding electrode/ filler wire to be used on grade 4Q casting.   With regards, Sivaraman.P -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents. -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit ...

Re: [MW:9615] Cr. % Variation after Heat Treatment.

Dear Israr,                PMI  is technique for fast identification of materials. When it is used for accurate measurements of chemical composition, problems arise. If you observe the standard deviation beside the reading, you may understand the reason for this variation. In XRF, the reading is given by the electron signal generated by the incident X-rays, so during X-ray irradiation the number of electrons removed may vary for each reading taken; the detector noise may also affect the reading. As a precaution, please use the PMI at max. temp of 40°C beyond which detector has more noise signal. 2011/1/31 israr ahmed < ahmedisrar.nm@gmail.com > Dear All,   I had Witnessed a PMI test on Material 34CrNiMo6 The Cr. % obtain 1.3 to 1.4, After Machining the Rod and Heat treatment and temparing the same material is tested fore PMI and found Cr.0.98 to 1.2 Percent.The Cr. % become less by 0.1 to 0.2 %. Can any body tell what may be the reason. Regards Israr Ahmed Noor Mohammed +91...

[MW:9608] REGARDING PQR

Dear Sir,                  I would like to know that base on previous projects qualified PQR says that Argon Gas purity 99.90% but requirement is 99.996%.Main things is gas is essential variable So I want to use this PQR.During preparation wps, can i  purpose argon purity is 99.996%   Pl suggestion me   Regards Bijaya -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

[MW:9607] Electrode/Filler wire for Grade 4Q casting

Dear all,   Please let me know the welding electrode/ filler wire to be used on grade 4Q casting.   With regards, Sivaraman.P -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

[MW:9605] Re: How to select equivalent grade material? A36 equivalent??

Hi At the first,it is important that the mechanical properties of chosen material be the same, the yield point and the tensile point of A36 is the same for all thicknesses, But there is a little difference about the material (Specially sheet metal) that is categorized by EN 10025 like s235 becuase the yield point of the s235 that is similar to A36 (almost) is going down when the thickness is going up but the issue that is very important is the Design assumptions. I can send you the summarized properties of the materials if you want but the final decision must be taken by the designer and accorting to design assumption. regards M.R On Jan 31, 4:52 pm, Srinivas Engr < srinivas.gmsr...@gmail.com > wrote: > Dear All. > pl guide be about in selction of equivalent grade material? > Wat we have to look? > & In which spec we have to refer? > Wat r A36 equivalent materials..? > Wat about S275 grade material? > > Thanks & Regards > Srinivas -- To pos...

Re: [MW:9605] ASME manual

please visit below link http://www.aircoolertechnology.com/QC%20system%20manual.pdf this is sample only , -- Thanks & Regards. Santosh Gaikwad Material Testing & Inspection Services(MTIS), Surat,India. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Purvin Bhatt < vareniumengentrprise@gmail.com > wrote: Thanks for keeping me update on it, but it is ISO manual not ASME U stamp manual. On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Jatin < vareniumengentrprise@gmail.com > wrote: Hello,  I am willing to read U stamp manual & very keen to read how this system works. Any body can help me Best regards Jatin -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take...

[MW:9604] How to select equivalent grade material? A36 equivalent??

Dear All. pl guide be about in selction of equivalent grade material? Wat we have to look? & In which spec we have to refer? Wat r A36 equivalent materials..? Wat about S275 grade material? Thanks & Regards Srinivas -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Re: [MW:9603] ASME manual

Thanks for keeping me update on it, but it is ISO manual not ASME U stamp manual. On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Jatin < vareniumengentrprise@gmail.com > wrote: Hello,  I am willing to read U stamp manual & very keen to read how this system works. Any body can help me Best regards Jatin -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents. -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materia...

Re: Re: [MW:9602] Hoe to select Flange's rating and class

Hi, Can you please give notes that to how to read from where . Say if I want to select on 12" A 106 Gr B pipe for sour service . how to select the rating of flange from this chart . can you please explain? On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:59:46 +0530 wrote >Dear Saamy, 1- Flange material shall be selected based on service conditions (fluid properties such as corrosiveness, temperature, hydrogen contents,...). 2- Based on design pressure, design temperature and material of construction the flange rating shall be selected according to pressure/temperature rating tables of ASME b16.5. Based on my long experience on this matter I found that working with pressure/temperature rating tables of ASME b16.5 is not so easy and accurate. So I converted these tables to the graphs which is in attached as a pdf file for your convenience. Hope it will be useful for you. Regards, Karandish > From: muthu barathi >To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com >Sent: Mon,...

Re: [MW:9601] P1 no Range

Dear Puneet,   IS 2062 Gr A, is unlisted , but max. properties were equalent to P1. but while preparing WPS/PQR use Material Spec as IS 2062 GrA .   SS 410 is Martensitic Steels, its P No is 6 On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:04 PM, puneet takiar < puneet1takiar@yahoo.com > wrote: Hello! Can anybody tell me in which P. no IS 2062 grade A and SS 410 will fall and how to search in ASME sex IX table. Regards,   puneet takiar From: Karthik < karthik6684@yahoo.com > To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Sent: Fri, 7 January, 2011 1:46:08 PM Subject: Re: [MW:0] P1 no Range Hi, Please refer QW423 also QW 350 for essential variables. Thanks & Regards, (Karthik) Karthikeyan.S QA/QC Manager Getabec Energy Co.,Ltd. 379,Moo6,Soi8,Nikhomphatana, Rayong-21180, Thailand. Phone: 0066 38 897035-8 (Off) Fax: 0066 38 897034 Hand Phone: 0066 892512282 --- On Fri, 1/7/11, sn vl < weldinspn@gmail.com > wrote: From: sn vl < weldinspn@gmail.com...

Re: [MW:9600] Flattening Test for SA 106

  Dear Bathula,   Thanks for the Quick Response. I would still look forward where the defination of " Under" and "Above" is clearly defined in ASME/ASTM Standards.   Regards VPV ____________________________________________________________________ On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) < R.Bathula@ticb.com > wrote: Excludes 2" Refer para  11.1 " For pipe NPS 2 and under a sufficient length of pipe shall stand being bent cold through 90°………….."     From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto: materials-welding@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of Vino Varghese Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 4:24 PM To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: [MW:9597] Flattening Test for SA 106   Dear Experts,   Refer to Section 12.0(Flattening Test) of SA 106, ASME Sec II Part A. This Section states that - " For Pipe over NPS 2 a section of pipe not less than........"   Que...

Re: [MW:9599] Hoe to select Flange's rating and class

Dear Saamy,   1- Flange material shall be selected based on service conditions (fluid properties such as corrosiveness, temperature, hydrogen contents,...) . 2- Based on design pressure, design temperature and material of construction the flange rating shall be selected according to pressure/temperature rating tables of ASME b16.5. Based on my long experience on this matter I found that working with pressure/temperature rating tables of ASME b16.5 is not so easy and accurate. So I converted these tables to the graphs which is in attached as a pdf file for your convenience.   Hope it will be useful for you.   Regards, Karandish From: muthu barathi <muthu_barathi@rediffmail.com> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Sent: Mon, 31 January, 2011 1:32:49 PM Subject: Re: [MW:9592] Hoe to select Flange's rating and class Hi, You have to refer your LDT (Line designation table) and P & ID (Process instrument diagram). On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:49:05 +0530...

RE: [MW:9598] Flattening Test for SA 106

Excludes 2” Refer para  11.1 “ For pipe NPS 2 and under a sufficient length of pipe shall stand being bent cold through 90°…………..”     From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Vino Varghese Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 4:24 PM To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: [MW:9597] Flattening Test for SA 106   Dear Experts,   Refer to Section 12.0(Flattening Test) of SA 106, ASME Sec II Part A. This Section states that - " For Pipe over NPS 2 a section of pipe not less than........"   Question : Does the above Interpretation includes 2" or excludes 2" for the Flattening Test? Do provide the reference of ASME/ASTM which supports the Interpretation.   The MTC recieved does not reflect the Flattening Test.( Material - 2", Sch 80, SA 106 Gr.B for ...

[MW:9597] Flattening Test for SA 106

Dear Experts,   Refer to Section 12.0(Flattening Test) of SA 106, ASME Sec II Part A. This Section states that - " For Pipe over NPS 2 a section of pipe not less than........"   Question : Does the above Interpretation includes 2" or excludes 2" for the Flattening Test? Do provide the reference of ASME/ASTM which supports the Interpretation.   The MTC recieved does not reflect the Flattening Test.( Material - 2", Sch 80, SA 106 Gr.B for Sour Service)   Hope to see as usual co-operation from everyone in Material Group.   Thanks & Regards Vino P Varghese Doha-Qatar -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users mus...

Re: [MW:9596] ASME manual

Dear jatin,   Please got to the Fabtech International oficial website you can read their ASME manual   Regards   RInshu On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Jatin < vareniumengentrprise@gmail.com > wrote: Hello,  I am willing to read U stamp manual & very keen to read how this system works. Any body can help me Best regards Jatin -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents. -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, v...

Re: [MW:9594] Cr. % Variation after Heat Treatment.

Hi, IT MAY BE DUE TO Cr MAY NOT HOMOGENEOUSLY mixed or while you tested that spot might be different than this spot some variation or first reading may not correct or this reading. You may recalibrate the PMI machine. Or you may go for other machine and also go for chemical analysis. On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:09:32 +0530 wrote >Dear All,   I had Witnessed a PMI test on Material 34CrNiMo6 The Cr. % obtain 1.3 to 1.4, After Machining the Rod and Heat treatment and temparing the same material is tested fore PMI and found Cr.0.98 to 1.2 Percent.The Cr. % become less by 0.1 to 0.2 %. Can any body tell what may be the reason. Regards Israr Ahmed Noor Mohammed +919930308261 -- > To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials- welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials- welding.blogspot.com/ > The view...

[MW:9593] Re: Hoe to select Flange's rating and class

Refer ASME 16.5, Based on material, select material group & pressure temperature rating table. Rating & class can be determined based on design temperatre & pressure. On Jan 31, 10:11 am, Saamy < krishnasamy1...@gmail.com > wrote: > Dear All! > Could you explain me how to select flange ratings and class against > service, temp, and pressure? > > Thanks! > > Saamy -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Re: RE: [MW:9591] AW: 9550] Re: Requirement of suitable welding consumables SAW and SMAW for API 5L X65

Hi, Thank you I selected SMAW - ESAB E8018-G and for SAW OK Autorod 13.24 - F8A10-EG-G Thank you. On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:03:03 +0530 wrote > P { MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px } Hi You can use E 8018 for SMAW for API 5L X65. From ESAB it is available. Regards Rajappan From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [materials- welding@googlegroups.com] on behalf of muthu barathi [muthu_barathi@rediffmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 9:33 AM To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MW:9556] AW: 9550] Re: Requirement of suitable welding consumables SAW and SMAW for API 5L X65 Hi, Mr.Siegbert thank you for your reply but I want to use SMAW and SAW process as I have welders qualified in SMAW and SAW welders also I do not have FCAW machines. Thanking You. With Regards, Muthu Barathi P On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:53:51 +0530 wrote >Dear Mr. Muthu, It seems you need a usual welding material like E71T-1M/E...

Re: [MW:9592] Hoe to select Flange's rating and class

Hi, You have to refer your LDT (Line designation table) and P & ID (Process instrument diagram). On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:49:05 +0530 wrote >Dear All! Could you explain me how to select flange ratings and class against service, temp, and pressure? Thanks! Saamy -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials- welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials- welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents. Dear Sir, Thanking You, Honesty is the best Policy With Warm Regards, Muthu Barathi P Mobile No:00962788269821 (Jordan) 00962775401951 -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.c...

RE: [MW:9590] Expiry period for SMAW consumable-reg

Dear Mr Pradip,                            Yes your statement is perfectly correct.   Thank you, Ilangkumaran   From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of PREM SHANKARDUTT NAUTIYAL Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:48 PM To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MW:9589] Expiry period for SMAW consumable-reg   Hi Pl. browse the reply already given in earlier thread - MW:4205 : It’s true that boiler or pressure vessel codes or structural welding codes do not specify the shelf-life or expiry dates of welding electrodes. For example, ASME Nuclear Codes Sec-III, Clause & NB, NC-2440 specifies that:- Suitable storage and handling of electrodes, flux, and other welding materials shall be maintained. Precautions shall be taken to minimize absorption of moisture by fluxes and cor...

Re: [MW:9589] Expiry period for SMAW consumable-reg

Hi Pl. browse the reply already given in earlier thread - MW:4205 : It's true that boiler or pressure vessel codes or structural welding codes do not specify the shelf-life or expiry dates of welding electrodes. For example, ASME Nuclear Codes Sec-III, Clause & NB, NC-2440 specifies that:- Suitable storage and handling of electrodes, flux, and other welding materials shall be maintained. Precautions shall be taken to minimize absorption of moisture by fluxes and cored, fabricated, and coated electrodes. The shelf-life of welding electrodes to a great extent depends on electrode manufacturer's methods, quality control procedure and how electrodes are handled. Depending on the coating type, packing (hermetically sealed or not), storing methods and ambient conditions, humidity etc, electrodes may last long or less. However as a good practice and based on electrode manufacturer's guidelines it may be worth considering:- · Solid Wires, GTAW/GMAW-No shelf Life...

Re: Re: Re: Re: [MW:9588] AW: 9550] Re: Requirement of suitable welding consumables SAW and SMAW for API 5L X65

Mr. Praveen , You are correct definitely we can not get El 46% but we can get YS and TS with base metal matching by that way it will pass in TS and naturally it will pass impact at -10 deg C so PQR will be passed. Thank you On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:49:40 +0530 wrote >Mr.Muthu, You mean to say that the PQR when qualified should meet or exceed the actual values mentioned in the MTC and not the minimum specified for the base material (X65). I think such a requirement is very unusual, you can match the strength part, but I think its going to be a difficult task in locating a consumable to give you 46% elongation. Wish you good luck! Regards, Praveen > >--- On Mon, 1/31/11, muthu barathi wrote: > >From: muthu barathi >Subject: Re: Re: Re: [MW:9584] AW: 9550] Re: Requirement of suitable welding consumables SAW and SMAW for API 5L X65 >To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com >Date: Monday, January 31, 2011, 1:27 PM > > Mr. Pra...