Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Re: [MW:28533] Branch PWHT - Control Thickness

consider 1  because specify branch connection ,
 no. 2 just for pressure & non pressure part joint eg. support 

regard
rajesh


On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:36 AM Hareesh K V <hareesh13h@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sir,

Situation: 
Welding of pipe branch connection with RF pad.
Header size: 20mm; Thickness of RF Pad: 20mm
Branch pipe thickness: 10.97mm
Whether PWHT is required for the branch connection?

As per ASME B 31.3, Clause 331.1.3 (a), the PWHT control thickness is the lesser of the below two conditions,

(1) the thickness of the weld [ As per clause 331.1.3 (b) (5) the control thickness of branch can be calculated.]

(2) the thickness of the materials being joined at the weld or the thickness of the pressure-containing material if the weld is attaching a nonpressure containing material to a pressure-containing material.

Here can i consider (2) as 20mm as that is the thickness of the material being used in this situation and consider the same as the control thickness for PWHT?

Regards,

Hareesh K V
+91-8547859202

--
----------------------
Hareesh K V
+91-9447625012


--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...