Monday, October 22, 2018

Re: [MW:28475] Re: Difference between the electrode E8018 B-8 & E8015 B-8

Can you please elaborate what meant by more impurities? as all the elements added into the coating are deliberately added to achieve the required characteristics. 

Thanks & regards
Sandeep Kumar

On Monday, October 22, 2018 at 11:22:26 AM UTC+3, kannayeram gnanapandithan wrote:
8018 will have more impurities compare to 8015

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, BE, IWE,  CSWIP 3.1,
ASNT-Level II in PT,MT,RT & UT.
International Welding Engineer. 
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY
Mobile no: +919940739349


On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:57 AM sandeep kumar <sandeep...@gmail.com> wrote:
E8018-B8 and E8015-B8 both are basic low alloy steel electrode having same chemical composition of undiluted weld metal & mechanical properties and being used for the welding of 7 to 9 Cr-Mo type steel. You can also use it to weld 5Cr-1/2Mo to 7 to 9 Cr-Mo dissimilar weld joint.

The min difference is in the coating & electrical characteristics. E8015-B8 coating is having sodium silicate binding and hence can be used only for DCEP polarity.
While E8018-B8 having potassium silicate binding in the coating which enable to be used on DCEP and AC polarity, with added iron powder they enable better conductivity for current flow via the electrode coating & hence higher weld deposition.
 
E8018-B8 i having better arc striking & stabling quality than the E8015-B8 due to coating characteristics. E8015-B8 is having improved characteristics for the pipe welding compare to the other one involved in this discussion.


Thanks & regards
Sandeep Kumar


On Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 8:50:29 AM UTC+3, Biplab Pal wrote:
Dear Experts,

Can any body differentiate between the electrodes E8018 B-8 & E8015 B-8, and the difference of applicable areas.

--
Thanks & Regards
Biplab Pal
Welding Inspector
E-mail:   bipla...@gmail.com
 
Information in this email and any attachments is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed or otherwise directed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Myself accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
 

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...