Hi..
Good question.. I would like to add possible option say that we qualify a PQR joining the P11 with P91 with the B2 or B6 electrode and make full destructive test to evaluate the weld soundness and the weldability...
Once we have valid PQR and pass all the test consider that sufficiently enough be used at Site.
I know this not the right solution but maybe an option from the Contractor who like to take advantage..
Thanks
Ghafor
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA
Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...
-
Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? ...
-
Definition of buttering from ASME Section IX, QW/QB-492 Definitions: Buttering: the addition of material, by welding, on one or bot...
-
Section I. PRINT READING 3-1. GENERAL a. Drawings . Drawing or sketching is a universal language used to convey all necessary information to...
No comments:
Post a Comment