Monday, June 25, 2012

[MW:14685] Re: LWN flange...............

Hi, I think contractor is trying to skip it. Class # 150 & #300 is different working pressure, how can they mean it is the same even the dimension is the same. It they evidence class #150 is satisfied with design, we can approve but they must submit the caculation. So far, you must refer process, working pressure in specification and operation condition to review it. The best way, you still reject except your client accept them. So, it is low risk with you.
Lakin
On Friday, June 22, 2012 7:33:59 PM UTC+7, shanmugam govindarajan wrote:
 Dear Experts,

Please clarify the below problem.
Contractor has welded 2" 150# LWN flange with the vessel. Approved drawing requires 2" 300# LWN flange. Contractor proposes to cut and remove the bolting part of the LWN flange and weld with the 300# bolting part of LWN flange. Their intention is not to disturb the vessel and due to tight schedule. But I told them that entire LWNF shall be removed from the vessel and shall be welded with 300# LWNF. Contractor says calculation for both 150# and 300# is same , so there is no problem.

Please clarify whether this is a correct approach.
  
 

With regards,

Govi

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35289] Welding consumable for S355J2WP material

S355 J2 WP  is a weathering structural steel  It has better atmospheric corrosion resistance. Use E 8018 - W1/W2  Electrodes This is regular...