Re: [MW:27190] MR0103 Marking required or LOC . Which one acceptable

Dear sir 

Please check in MTC value of the sulphour max0.010% and hardness max 22 HRCif this two condition comply then only manufacture can issue letter of compliance Nace mr 103 

And more Mill can issue seprate latter if anything missed to mentioned in MTC . Ultimately it is issue from manufacturers 

It is purely acceptable 

Thanks 

Ritesh rajput

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:09 AM SRINI <kanna.qc@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sir,

Material: ASTM 182 Gr 321H (FLANGE)

Size:1/2 inch x sch 80 s

As per client requirement MR0103

Manufacture not marking on flange as MR0103 , But manufacture given LOC for flange as meeting requirement MR0103.

 In MR0103 did not mentioned formarking,but MR0175 they mentioned at para 7.1 marking or documents also acceptable.

1)Is it acceptable or not.

2) according to which standard.

Please give advice and solution.

Regards

ASN

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.