Tuesday, October 6, 2015

[MW:23666] Re: PDR for a SSWOL nozzle fitted to an ASME -VIII Div1 vessel // UG-11(c)

Since it is a standard product (LWN Flange), assuming  WOL is not part of strength calculations, going by UG 11,  Parts furnished under the provisions of (b), (c), and (d) need not be manufactured by a Certificate Holder. In my opinion  The nozzle could be furnished under the provisions of UG-11(c) as a manufacturer's standard in which case all of the rules in UG-11 as applicable to this construction shall be met, including establishing a pressure-temperature rating.
 

On 5 October 2015 at 19:31, Shashank Vagal <nach_sam@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks, Mr Raghuram,
But what I see in the link is related to WOL flanges (fittings) and in the attachment I sent, it clearly says they are exempt. My question is regarding SSWOL seamless nozzles. Most of the postings say PDR is required for flanges, but ASME reply says NOT REQUIRED.
Will seamless SSWOL nozzles need a PDR, please advise. 
BR,
Shashank C Vagal (Quality Adviser)


From: Raghuram Bathula <raghurambathula@gmail.com>
To: Materials-Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Nachiket vagal <nach_sam@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, 5 October 2015 4:21 PM
Subject: PDR for a SSWOL nozzle fitted to an ASME -VIII Div1 vessel // UG-11(c)

Dear Mr Vagal

I didn't see this post, however similar query was discussed previously, pl refer below link
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups&nomobile=true#!searchin/materials-welding/pdr/materials-welding/2i8HQkAZlew/kqKGa6PKx5oJ


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shashank Vagal <nach_sam@yahoo.com>
Date: 5 October 2015 at 18:28
Subject: Please advise
To: Raghuram Bathula 


Dear Raghuram,
A few days ago, I had posted in this blog a query regarding requirement of PDR for a SSWOL nozzle fitted to an ASME -VIII Div1 (2013)
vessel, but did not receive any reply from any of the members.
Please advise me referring to the attached reply from ASME sent to our Welding Engineer by ASME Standards and Certification Engineer.
Since this Code reference is for 1989 Ed, and I do not have it, I would appreciate if you could give your best judgement whether we need PDR.
Please excuse my writing to you personally, but in the interest of the subject matter, I hope you will help me out.    
BR,
Shashank C Vagal 
Neo Metal-Analyst & NDT Services 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CADxVub%3DBgZQg%2BRRE5BN6R4jh4NaZ68w1P3amPv0M6GNPAafEZA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35241] Overlay welding defects

Dear Sir, The below is another type of defect,Mostly these two type of defects we faced. Regards, R.Gowtham. On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:42 PM...