The standard flare-groove detail is P10 in ASW D1.1 indicating that it is a PJP weld. If a weld size is not indicated, it is assumed it is a full thickness weld & I believe this is where the confusion comes in. It's a partial penetration with full thickness and that's where the argument starts.This weld could be used as a full penetration weld (and held to that testing criteria) but the detailer must be specific about the intentions, particularly if it is used in a critical joint.
Gene Matsko
On Friday, January 9, 2015 9:12 AM, BILLY TAN <bil19875539@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Experts
As per AWS D1.1 2010, whether Flare Bevel Groove Joint is a CJP or PJP? As per AWS A 2.4, the flare grove joint usually have a symbol of S(E), S represent the Distance of point of tangency to top member and E will be groove weld size. However in the IFC drawing we recieved , does not have any of S(E)?
Can you guys let me know whether it is PJP or CJP? Any clause in AWS or relevant code to support this?
Attached will be the sketch of drawing.
Best Regards,
Billy Tan
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/BAY176-W3887693A14BF880FE897E6A5440%40phx.gbl.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment