Materials & Welding

Pelase inform what wire are you using, and what construction code, do you have impact requierements? Sergio Muñoz IWE-IIW http://weld-ING.tk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/97db33ee-3af6-4f40-8cdc-ade5f6eeb83b%40googlegroups.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Rgds G.Prakash Independent Consultant, ASME AIS/ISO Technical Director, Hitek Engg Services, Dubai  gp rakash31@gmail.com . Tel: +9714 2778511 Mob:+97152 979 5678 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Kwangju Moon < xumker@gmail.com > wrote: Dear experts, Please clarify below questions. Back Ground: -        Applicable construction code: ASME Sec. VIII, Div.1 -        Material : SA516-70N (35mm) -        Equipment's MDMT: -20 ℃ -        The client request that impact testing shall comply with the code of construction and in accordance with PED 97/23/EC Annex 1, Para 7.5.   Question 1): Shall we have to perform the impact test on this material in accordance with PED requirement even impact test is exempted as per UCS-66, ASME Sec. VIII Div.1? ​   YES​ for material.   Question 2): When the impact test is required as per PED, should we have to use WPS with applying all supplementary essential requirements for weld joint? ​Fol...

Dear Experts Our production department used wrong Flux in welding with SAW process ,please give me idea about it in WPS mentioned Lincoln 880M and they used Lincoln 880  ...material is API 5l X65 to API 5L X65. please give a idea about this issue , and let me know if ASME section 9 has a way to confirm this issue . Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/b38a8775-3b41-4c96-9fcc-1902cc4408ea%40googlegroups.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Hi Amol, answering the cold forming intermidiate HT question, it depends on the determined fibre elongation. If your sphere fibre elongation is 5% and less, only cold forming is required before welding and if your fibre elongation is above 5% cold forming and intermidiate HT shall be applied. It is also advised to determine if PWHT is required since you are dealing with critical material (SA 517 Gr. F). I recommend that you consult ASME code to determine the fibre elongation. On Friday, January 2, 2015 at 10:26:08 AM UTC+2, amol wrote: we have to make a sphere from crown petal construction.Material SA 517 Gr F. UTS 790-820MPa. cold forming will be done whether this will require intermediate heat treatment to avoid formation of cracking? If so when/at which stage of forming it has to be carried out? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em...

Dear experts, Please clarify below questions. Back Ground: -        Applicable construction code: ASME Sec. VIII, Div.1 -        Material : SA516-70N (35mm) -        Equipment's MDMT: -20 ℃ -        The client request that impact testing shall comply with the code of construction and in accordance with PED 97/23/EC Annex 1, Para 7.5.   Question 1): Shall we have to perform the impact test on this material in accordance with PED requirement even impact test is exempted as per UCS-66, ASME Sec. VIII Div.1?   Question 2): When the impact test is required as per PED, should we have to use WPS with applying all supplementary essential requirements for weld joint? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe f...

You have to prepare two WPS for thicknesss of 10 mm and 20 mm. it will be ccover your required thickness range.  Position can be taken depend upon mfg. or drawing requirement. On Thursday, 29 January 2015 15:35:30 UTC+5:30, Akshith wrote: Dear Experts, Kindly suggest for preparation of structural WPS as per IS 7307, my structural steel thickness range is 4.7mm to 40 mm. Please suggest thickness range and positions are to be qualified as per IS 7307 & IS 7310. Regards, Akshith. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/9...

Dear Experts, Today I went through one MTC review for ASME SA516 in   Mfr shop   (the end user is   a refinery ). Where I found the Columbium 0.05. The table 1 of SA20 limits the columbium for heat analysis to  Max 0.02 % however the  Note D allows that to be  0.05 %. based on an agreement between purchaser and supplier. The vendor says they are purchaser and they have agreed with supplier so "it should be acceptable". They have purchased the material  out of stock.   Could I ask your kind opinion about this? Can I accept the material?   More details: There is no favour neither any objection about this requirement from client. The purchaser field in the MTC says: " To whome so ever it may concern " mfr  has purchased the material from A  Steel Trading Co. The certificate is EN10204-3.2 witnessed by TPI. The certification statement says " the material manufactured and tested according to the requirements specified in the order"   With Best Regards, Umar R...

Dear Experts, Kindly suggest for preparation of structural WPS as per IS 7307, my structural steel thickness range is 4.7mm to 40 mm. Please suggest thickness range and positions are to be qualified as per IS 7307 & IS 7310. Regards, Akshith. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/a1d52b67-a79a-458d-9a42-5673de5ed286%40googlegroups.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Dear Can anyone please explain with process reference code welding process types and for what thickness is it applicable to weld Regards Kk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAONn5B6KgAf46AHtBvs%2BW%3DetT--UdNHTXrtM7nSnqnQKOOCu1Q%40mail.gmail.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Hi jay , Refer ASME Sec IX QW- 202.2 (C) , ofcourse you have to write a WPS Separately for SMAW for Fillet Welds, with the same PQR No. Regards , Saravanan. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:44 PM, < george.dilintas@gr.bureauveritas.com > wrote: normally yes best regards Dr. Georgios Dilintas Authorized Nuclear Inspector Authorized Inspector Supervisor I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5 Fax: +30 210 40 63 118 Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04 This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group ...

normally yes best regards Dr. Georgios Dilintas Authorized Nuclear Inspector Authorized Inspector Supervisor I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5 Fax: +30 210 40 63 118 Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04 This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com

Using AWS  code NO. Using ASME  yes you have to write a new WPS  for single process. Sent from Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- From: Jay Poojary <jayogini@gmail.com> Date:28/01/2015 17:05 (GMT+08:00) To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Cc: Subject: [MW:22769] GTAW + SMAW Dear Experts, Please clarify. If I have qualified a procedure with combination process i.e GTAW+SMAW for groove joint, then using this procedure can I allow to weld fillet joints using SMAW. cordially, Jay Poojary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google....

Dear Experts, Please clarify. If I have qualified a procedure with combination process i.e GTAW+SMAW for groove joint, then using this procedure can I allow to weld fillet joints using SMAW. cordially, Jay Poojary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAAcO%3DyToxo3L--R8LjJ4aFCc2zrx8Yvo%2BE%2BMPFwzw%3DW8JLhZwQ%40mail.gmail.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Good analysis. Thnks for sharing. Agree that there is no question of stringent between stds. Each has some basis and needs to be complied Rgds Prakash. G. Independent Consultant. ASME/ISO/PED From: Vijay.Tayade@akersolutions.com Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2015 12:06 To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Reply To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [MW:22768] can we prepare new PQR with ASME and AWS and EN standard?... Hi, Prepare the Gap analysis covering all the...

Hi, Prepare the Gap analysis covering all the essential & non-essential parameters. Highlight the difference as stated in below emails. It is not recommended to say which code is more stringent than the other. Please be specific with your application and type of testing the weld joint requires for particular operating and design temperature and load.   Consider the attached files as reference for preparing Gap analysis. This is prepared for "Norsok M101 against AWS D1.1". (Note: Norsok M101 is application guidelines, based on EN 15614-1.)   Rgds Vijay Tayade.   From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 12:05 AM To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MW:22767] can we prepare new PQR with ASME and AWS and EN standard?...   EN 15614 is more stringent followed by ASME and AWS in order.   Type and no. t...