One thing that comes to my mind is it is probe sensitive.....
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, PEMMARAJU RAGHAVENDRA <rpe@hzw.ltindia.com> wrote:
From: PEMMARAJU RAGHAVENDRA <rpe@hzw.ltindia.com>
Subject: [MW:9770] Why not DGS method of UT in ASME Sec.V
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 8 February, 2011, 10:42 AM
Dear All, Can anyone give reason why DGS method for sensitivity and sizing of defects in UT is not being mentioned in ASME Sec. V where as several of Europe / Russian and Nuclear codes follow the same. As per ASME, DAC is being used for the above purpose. Can we approach ASME for the same. Regards, Raghavendra Larsen & Toubro Limited www.larsentoubro.com This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system. -- To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.comTo unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+ unsubscribe@googlegroups.comFor more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
|
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment