Materials & Welding

Hi Muhammed,   Please search in the scribd or slideshare , you’ll find tons of  resources. These are public domains and open to all.   Thanks.     Pradip Goswami, P.Eng,IWE Welding & Metallurgical Engineering Specialist Hamilton, Ontario, Canada pgoswami@quickclic.net pradip.goswami@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/pradip-goswami/5/985/299 From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Muhammed Hafis Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2015 12:47 AM To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Subject: [MW:23836] API 580 model questions   Dear Seniors                               Im Going to attend API 580 Exam in Dec 15,2015 in Damm...

I do agree with Mr. Prakash partially. The initial raised question can be addressed as "Dear Experts" but  subsequently its difficult to maintain the same. Just as an Eg: A third person enters the group after the 14th mail conversion, he won't be in a position to understand the last query if its addressed as "Experts". He might have to run through all the previous conversations. Further, the person who raises the query directly can response if a clarification against his query is required else if it is addressed as "Experts", he might get lost or could get unnoticed. I think the exchange of forum to individual is OK and should be seen in a lighter note. That's my opinion. Regards, Vino On Oct 31, 2015 1:21 AM, "Prakash Gotimukul" < gprakash31@gmail.com > wrote: I am going through some of the mails and literally the forum is being used as a means of correspondence between two individuals. This against the rules of the group. I ur...

I am going through some of the mails and literally the forum is being used as a means of correspondence between two individuals. This against the rules of the group. I urge all members to address the issue to the group and not to individual although a question is raised by individual. It should be addressed as Dear Experts/ or Nothing. Just put up the point for discussion and ask for a response. While replying also, you will answer to the point raised, not to the person raising the question. Hope people who have joined new understand that every individual of the group must get benefitted by the discussion. As far as possible raise a point and ask for response whether right or wrong. Individual problems must best be sorted out individually. The group will only help you understand the subject with more information and standard references, but will not solve or give solutions to problems. At most we may agree or disagree on a point. Hope all members will follow the above and make this for...

Dear Seniors                               Im Going to attend API 580 Exam in Dec 15,2015 in Dammam,ksa. I dnt have any model questions or any preparation guide to prepare for exam,other than the code book.                                                                             If anyone is there ,who already passed the exam or those who have sample questions ..Plzz advice mee for preparing exam or send mee the samples of questions. Advance thanks ______________________________________________ Muhammed Hafis QC-Supervisor Linde SADARA Al-Jubail-10 gethafis@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . To vie...

Hi, you can supplement it with a additional sheet containing the data you want to include. Sent from my iPad On 30-Oct-2015, at 18:21, george.dilintas@gr.bureauveritas.com wrote: A PQR is never revised. A WPS yes best regards Dr. Georgios Dilintas Authorized Nuclear Inspector Authorized Inspector Supervisor I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5 Fax: +30 210 40 63 118 Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04 This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-w...

Hi, Only if dished has a long seam then PDR need to be supplied by the part manufacturer. For explosion bonding no PDR is required, only certification need to obtained as per SA263/264/265 as applicable.  Sent from my iPad On 23-Oct-2015, at 12:25, bas karan < basvkaran@gmail.com > wrote: Dear Ajay, Hi to all, i am also facing same type of issue. i have bought a tubesheet for heat exchanger, CS(SA266Gr2) base metal with SS316L(SA240) clad plate 10 mm thick. My AI said, need to get the PDR from the vendor. But the vendor is no stamp holder. ASME VIII Div.1 - UW-27(2), explosive bonding included in pressure welding process and  added in ENDNOTES (70) - explosive welding—a solid state welding process wherein coalescence is produced by the application of pressure by means of an explosion. and another thins is clad plate is for corrosive resistance only, design calculation did not considered this clad plate thickness. please explain to me, what are the acitivities required to...

Did u use extensometer or not? You have to construct 0.2% offset on the strain axis and get the 0.2% yield strength. Probably ur software would have that option! 2015-10-29 19:13 GMT+04:00 Padmasanker S < padmasanker87@gmail.com > : Dear all, Please refer to attached stress -strain graph obtained during tensile testing of SA 106 Gr B pipe. While performing tensile testing of SA 106 pipes for Div 1 vessels ,we were not getting yield point even though required tensile strength is obtained. The specimen were taken in both  transverse and longitudinal direction from half thickness. Kindly share your experience  in finding the root cause.. Please inform if any further details is required for clarity. Best regards, Padmasanker, Quality coordinator, Bilfal heavy industries ltd. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from ...

That is because we define as Yield Point the stress at 0,2% permanent elongation best regards Dr. Georgios Dilintas Authorized Nuclear Inspector Authorized Inspector Supervisor I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5 Fax: +30 210 40 63 118 Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04 This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com

A PQR is never revised. A WPS yes best regards Dr. Georgios Dilintas Authorized Nuclear Inspector Authorized Inspector Supervisor I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5 Fax: +30 210 40 63 118 Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04 This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com

Then there is no need for PMDR best regards Dr. Georgios Dilintas Authorized Nuclear Inspector Authorized Inspector Supervisor I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5 Fax: +30 210 40 63 118 Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04 bas karan ---30/10/2015 15:04:31---Dear George, clad plate complies as per section II Part A specification of SA264. From: bas karan <basvkaran@gmail.com> To: Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> Date: 30/10/2015 15:04 Subject: Re: [MW:23824] ASME Sec VIII, Div 1, Pressure Vessel/ Dish End Sent by: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Dear George, clad plate complies as per section II Part A specification of SA264. attached clad plate test reports for your reference. sorry for the late reply. Regards Baskaran.v On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 7:11:52 PM UTC+8, George Dilintas wrote: The cladded tube sheet is not provided with an MTR in accordance with...