Hi guys
What is the tolerance given in the AMERICAN CODES for CE value for applicability of WPS and welder qualifications? Is it an essential variable? I think in British or japanese standards its given + 0.003 % Max.
Appreceiate any feed back.
Thanks and Regards
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 rajesh patel wrote :
>
>dear Friebds,
>
>I am a silent but regular reader of the mails shared
>by group memebers. I am greatful to receive such
>valuable information from the various people from
>every corners of the world. Through this group,I even
>recd some mails from my old couligues with whom i lost
>all contacts since last so many years.
>
>I may not be replying or sharing anything but i am
>very much interested to receive such mails. Whenever
>it feels necessary, I will definately contribute.
>
>Pl continue to send me mails.
>
>Regards,
>
>Rajesh B. Patel
>QC Engineer
>Adyard Abudhabi LLC
>
>--- "Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING)"
><R.Bathula@ticb.com> wrote:
>
> > No exchange of information since last 1 week, that's
> > why you were not
> > receiving any mails.
> >
> > Appreciate your concern and request members for
> > their active
> > participation.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: donboscomarine@vsnl.net
> > [mailto:donboscomarine@vsnl.net]
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:10 PM
> > To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [MW:659] Bolt Length in ASME B31.3
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Mr. Bathula Raghuram,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are not getting any communication since 12th
> > March, 2008. Before
> > that, we were witness to a very good exchange of
> > information. Any reason
> > for non-receipt of communication or is it just that
> > there has been No
> > Exchange? Will like to know the cause. We are
> > impressed by the quality
> > of information exchange and consider ourselves lucky
> > to have been a
> > memebr of this group.
> >
> >
> >
> > We will be obliged if a reply is sent ASAP.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks & B. Rgds.
> >
> >
> >
> > G. A. Soman
> >
> > Principal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DON BOSCO MARITIME ACADEMY
> >
> > Premier Automobiles Road,
> >
> > Kurla West, Mumbai 400070
> >
> > Tel: (022) 2504 1585 / 2018. Fax: (022) 2504 0682
> >
> > Email: donboscomarine@vsnl.net
> >
> > Website: www.dbma.in
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>Be a better friend, newshound, and
>know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>
>>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
[MW:670] Re: [MW:/] tolerance for CE
Mustak
There is nothing specific in ASME sec IX or AWS D1.1 for CE. However in case of sour service NACE RP 472 applies. If that applies in adidition to ASME sec IX then the maximum allowable CE will be restricted to the CE of PQR
Hope this helps
Kural Narayanan
On 19 Mar 2008 04:05:09 -0000, mustak patel <mustak_patel123@rediffmail.com> wrote:
Pages
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(983)
-
▼
March
(69)
- [MW:638] Re: RT after PWHT
- [MW:637] Re: Etch structure acceptance in IGC test...
- [MW:639] Re: 596] Re: selection of Production test...
- [MW:640] Re: Etch structure acceptance in IGC test...
- [MW:641] Re: 13% Cr steel valve trims
- [MW:642] Re: 13% Cr steel valve trims
- [MW:645] RE: 638] Re: RT after PWHT
- Dear Friends, Can any one through light on the ...
- [MW:644] Re: Hardness by Equotip
- [MW:646] Re: Hardness by Equotip
- [MW:647] Re: Hardness by Equotip
- [MW:648] Re: Hardness by Equotip
- [MW:649] Plant Case of Fire due to Loose Flange Bo...
- [MW:650] Re: Hardness by Equotip
- [MW:651] Fugitive emission test equipment
- [MW:652] RE: 327] Re: AUT Vs TOFD
- [MW:653] Re: 327] Re: AUT Vs TOFD
- [MW:654] Consumables for API 5L GR X65
- [MW:655] Re: Consumables for API 5L GR X65
- [MW:656] Flare Stack
- [MW:657] Re: Flare Stack
- [MW:658] Re: Flare Stack
- [MW:659] Bolt Length in ASME B31.3
- [MW:660] Safe radiography with cordoning in small ...
- [MW:661] NOT RECEIVING MAILS FROM GROUP SINCE 12TH...
- [MW:662] Re: NOT RECEIVING MAILS FROM GROUP SINCE ...
- [MW:/] tolerance for CE
- [MW:667] RE: 662] Re: NOT RECEIVING MAILS FROM GRO...
- [MW:664] Chemical cleaning for Marine boilers
- [MW:665] RE: 664] Chemical cleaning for Marine boi...
- [MW:668] Re: 664] Chemical cleaning for Marine boi...
- [MW:671] Re: [MW:/] tolerance for CE
- [MW:666] PED - Pressure Equipment Directive.
- [MW:669] Re: [MW:/] tolerance for CE
- [MW:672] ASME SEC VIII REQ AS PER 2007 EDITION
- [MW:670] Re: [MW:/] tolerance for CE
- [MW:673] Re: [MW:/] tolerance for CE
- [MW:674] Re: tolerance for CE
- [MW:675] Re: 664] Chemical cleaning for Marine boi...
- [MW:676] Re: [MW:/] tolerance for CE
- [MW:677] Re: ASME SEC VIII REQ AS PER 2007 EDITION
- 200 series Vs. 300 series stainless steels
- [MW:678] Do austenitic stainless steels require im...
- [MW:679] Why do WCC and LCC castings have differen...
- Why did MR0175 become an ISO standard, and how do ...
- When specifying valves for hydrogen service, what ...
- My 316 stainless-steel valve is rusty and attracts...
- [MW:680] duplex stainless-steel castings ASTM A890...
- [MW:681] Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:682] Re: Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:683] Re: Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:684] PQR
- [MW:685] RE: 683] Re: Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:686] PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:688] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:687] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:689] RE: 688] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:690] Re: 688] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:691] Re: 688] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:692] Re: 688] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:694] Re: 688] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:693] Re: 683] Re: Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:695] Re: 683] Re: Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:696] Re: 683] Re: Section IX QW 200.4(b)
- [MW:697] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:698] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:699] RE: 698] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
- [MW:700] pabitra das wants to chat
- [MW:701] Re: 698] Re: PMI TESTING OF SS 304L
-
▼
March
(69)
|
google.com, pub-7981607153005192, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Search This BlogWikipediaSearch results
Followers |
No comments:
Post a Comment