Thanks for reply..
Yes, I know thats the normal practice, UT and MT in Tie-ins..But, Is
there any thing with regards to this mentioned in the code B 31.3 or
even B31.4 / B 31.8..
Regards
On Mar 7, 10:25 am, syed farhan rezvi <samre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi to all,
>
> As i believe after reading your mail it's a TIE-IN between
> old and new line,
> if it so, please do UT for thickness checking in the old & MT on same
> line in bevel and HAZ( you can prefer PT if the thickness of line is
> less than 19 mm).
>
> Syed Farhan
> Piping Engineer
> Hyundai Heavy Industries
>
> On 06/03/2009, VJ V <veeve...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi All,
>
> > There are a couple of Tie-in/Closure joints to be welded in the
> > project, I am involved right now. No possibility of Leak test/
> > Hydrotest for that joint..
>
> > Project spec is ASME B31.3(100% RT),and
> > I would like to know is there any requirement of UT and cut bevel MT/
> > UT,additional to RT specified by the Code for Closure/ Tie in joints.
>
> > I couldn't see that requirement(cut bevel MT,UT) in B 31.3......Am I
> > right ?
>
> > I have done earlier UT,cut bevel MT additional to RT in other
> > projects,but that was as per project spec.
>
> > Thanks- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
No comments:
Post a Comment