Skip to main content

[MW:1781] Dye penetrant examination on Al-Bronze material

Dear all,

Can anybody give their input on the following issue of LPT/DPT on Al-Bronze
casting:

One of our valve manufacturer has indicated inability to carry out Surface
flaw test and instead suggesting Radiography for Al-Bronze casting.
Following is the brief explanation that vendor has provided.

"....so far all (100%) of the castings we have made have been rejected by
the test house we are using. The reason is that every casting is exhibiting
very shallow linear surface 'flaws' along the lines of section change and
at the location of the joints on the patterns.
I understand from the lab that these superficial 'flaws' are common on
aluminium bronze castings and reference to another customer who uses this
technique backs this up. They can be easily removed by polishing the
surface of the casting in the affected areas. Unfortunately, without the
ability in house to find the flaws we cannot deal with the issue before the
laboratory tests them. Not only that but when they are rejected we have no
means of seeing the flaws ourselves.
While I'm confident that the castings are sound – we've had castings
x-rayed to prove it – we cannot overcome this dye penetrant issue.
Unfortunately, despite making a fair number of castings and having each
checked we are going to have to accept that we cannot make the castings
under the required specification. I appreciate that this is a major
inconvenience to you and for that I apologise. We cast a huge number of
castings in aluminium bronze with great success particularly in the fluid
handling industry. Therefore we never considered dye pen would present such
an obstacle. We still believe the castings to be of high quality and
integrity on a par with anything else we've made but I know that's no
consolation if there's a spec that has to be met."

Of course, I have no experience in Al-Bronze, I am not fully agreed with
the above explanation, and we are asking them to carry out the DPT only
(even after grinding or wire brushing if required to remove the surface
flaws). Your valuable input will be very useful for me.


Best regards,

Prasad


Save a tree...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.


This email and any attached files ("Message") may contain confidential and/or privileged information. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you receive this Message in error, inform the sender by reply email, delete the Message and destroy any printed copy.
Any unauthorized use, distribution, or copying of this Message or any part thereof is prohibited. Emails are susceptible to alteration. Neither Technip nor any of its affiliates shall be liable for the Message if altered or falsified nor shall they be liable for any damage caused by any virus that might be transmitted with this Message.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...