Wednesday, March 18, 2009

[MW:1781] Dye penetrant examination on Al-Bronze material

Dear all,

Can anybody give their input on the following issue of LPT/DPT on Al-Bronze
casting:

One of our valve manufacturer has indicated inability to carry out Surface
flaw test and instead suggesting Radiography for Al-Bronze casting.
Following is the brief explanation that vendor has provided.

"....so far all (100%) of the castings we have made have been rejected by
the test house we are using. The reason is that every casting is exhibiting
very shallow linear surface 'flaws' along the lines of section change and
at the location of the joints on the patterns.
I understand from the lab that these superficial 'flaws' are common on
aluminium bronze castings and reference to another customer who uses this
technique backs this up. They can be easily removed by polishing the
surface of the casting in the affected areas. Unfortunately, without the
ability in house to find the flaws we cannot deal with the issue before the
laboratory tests them. Not only that but when they are rejected we have no
means of seeing the flaws ourselves.
While I'm confident that the castings are sound – we've had castings
x-rayed to prove it – we cannot overcome this dye penetrant issue.
Unfortunately, despite making a fair number of castings and having each
checked we are going to have to accept that we cannot make the castings
under the required specification. I appreciate that this is a major
inconvenience to you and for that I apologise. We cast a huge number of
castings in aluminium bronze with great success particularly in the fluid
handling industry. Therefore we never considered dye pen would present such
an obstacle. We still believe the castings to be of high quality and
integrity on a par with anything else we've made but I know that's no
consolation if there's a spec that has to be met."

Of course, I have no experience in Al-Bronze, I am not fully agreed with
the above explanation, and we are asking them to carry out the DPT only
(even after grinding or wire brushing if required to remove the surface
flaws). Your valuable input will be very useful for me.


Best regards,

Prasad


Save a tree...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.


This email and any attached files ("Message") may contain confidential and/or privileged information. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you receive this Message in error, inform the sender by reply email, delete the Message and destroy any printed copy.
Any unauthorized use, distribution, or copying of this Message or any part thereof is prohibited. Emails are susceptible to alteration. Neither Technip nor any of its affiliates shall be liable for the Message if altered or falsified nor shall they be liable for any damage caused by any virus that might be transmitted with this Message.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

No comments:

Re: [MW:34874] ASME IX, groove weld during WQT limits for Fillet Weld production

Hi David,  There are two points in WQT. 1. Thickness of Base Metal -T 2. Thickness of Weld Metal -t When you use a combination of two proces...