Skip to main content

[MW:1849] Re: Query on SMAW electrode selection for API 5L X65

Dear all,

The root pass is grinded to te half (aprx) before make the hot pass. the efectiva area is fullfilled with hot+filler passes, then the final strenght of joint doesn't depend on root pass.

Regarding metallurgical issues I agree and give thanks to Mr. Babu for the explanation.

One more factor is the operative difficult of make the root pass with 7010 or 8010.

BR


Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:19:46 +0800
Subject: [MW:1847] Re: Query on SMAW electrode selection for API 5L X65
From: kbabupsg@gmail.com
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com

Hi,
 
The strength of joint not purely depend on the root pass.
 
My explanation as follows, 
 
1) Main problem starts at Root  if you have the different metallurgical phases at the root, , say you have 50% ferrite and 50% pearlite, the properties of metallurgical phases are different. Obviously that would carry forward to mechanical properties too.
 
2) As we all ,know the corrosion starts, where ever you have two differrent phases or chemical composition ; So in order to avoid this variation , it is necessary to keep the dilution level to minimum in the root pass
 
3) It is well proved by the researchers that, dilution is more on the root pass.
 
4) The strength of weld, not purely depend on the Root passes.
 
 
Thanks & regards,
 
 
K.Babu
Singapore
 


 
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, ARI <ariv2k@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
 
Using E6010-G would keep the dilution level as minimum, but at the same time, it wouldn;t give the UTS equal to Parent metal UTS for API5L X65?

Regards,
 
Ari
 
On 3/21/09, babu k <kbabupsg@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,
 
Put it in simple words, the use of E6010-G is to keep the dilution level to be minimum ; 
 
Thanks & Regards,
 
K.Babu
Singapore
 

 
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Ari <ariv2k@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear All,

Can you please advise, why E6010-G (root) & E-7010-P1 (hot/fill) are
used for Oil pipelines(Sour) containing parent material of API 5L X65.
Since these type of PQR/WPS are being approved by most of the
Company.

As, X65 has an YS of 65,000 Psi, whilst the electrodes used E6010 has
YS of  48,000 Psi, and E-7010-P1 has YS of 60,000 psi. By using both
of these electrodes the weld metal strength would not exceed  YS
60,000 psi.

How its acceptable to keep the low weld metal strength(<YS 60,000 Psi)
than the parent metal (= YS 65,000Psi).

Thy suppose to use E8010 for root and E8018 for hot/fill, for API 5L
X65 materials, which only would give the equivalent WM strength.

As we all know that overmatching weld metal strength causes gross
section yielding in the pipe, whereas Undermatching weld metal
strength will cause straining of the weld.

Your advise/suggession, based on experience is appreciated.

Regards,

Ari






<span



See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...