Yes you can without a new PQR provided other parameters are within approval range
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: JERRY TUAN
Sent: Κυριακή, 8 Νοεμβρίου 2015 - 06:13
To: Materials & Welding
Reply To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:23864] Revise was according to EN15614-1
If my pqr . I used butt joint double V, wire diameter 4.8 mm ,process SAW . Now I want to revise wps to used wire diameter 4.0 mm , is this ok
Thanks for help
Tuan.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/78a855f3-c4ca-4428-a39f-eaf687e97905%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com
Hi, You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this. Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime. Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC. The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case). One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example. In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...
Comments