[MW:2557] Re: 2550] D1.1 - WPS - Semi-Auto vs Auto - Need new PQR/WPS

You can use existing WPQR, as you already mentioned you have to stay within qualified ranges (positions).

> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:55:53 -0700
> Subject: [MW:2554] Re: 2550] D1.1 - WPS - Semi-Auto vs Auto - Need new PQR/WPS
> From: JRupert@Dresser-Rand.com
> To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
>
>
> Any issues with welder vs welding operator qualification? I'm less
> familiar with D1.1 vs ASME.
>
> On Jun 25, 9:34 am, "Armstrong, Joel" <JoelArmstr...@letu.edu> wrote:
> > Yes, we've done the same thing here with the approval of ABS and no need to requalify.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com on behalf of ikaria73
> > Sent: Thu 6/25/2009 8:27 AM
> > To: Materials & Welding
> > Subject: [MW:2550] D1.1 - WPS - Semi-Auto vs Auto - Need new PQR/WPS
> >
> > Hello,
> > Is a new PQR required if the process is changed from semi-automatic to
> > automatic?  I am welding piles and would like to use a BUG-O system
> > with FCAW-GS and already have a PQR/WPS with FCAW-GS semi-automatic.
> > Can I use the existing PQR to create a new WPS as long as I stay
> > within the procedures?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >  winmail.dat
> > 5KViewDownload
>
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---