[MW:2484] Re: Pl.Help.

Hi Prashant,

 

It seems to be serious mishap at the outset, but if the customer is ok with it, then why should your employer have any issues?

 

If you have any criteria or past experience where you had succesfully used the 10% principle that you can demonstrate to your firm, then I guess you should be ok.

 

I will check further and see if I can get any more information.

 

Thanks

 

Johnson

 

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Johnson Madukayil <jmadukayil@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Prashant,

What do you mean by 10% inspection of seat? Dimensional or visual on hydrotest?

Regards

Johnson

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Muni Andy <cmkfc07@gmail.com> wrote:

There is no standard for quantity to be tested for seat test in valves.I agree with Abhijit.
Muni

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:11 PM, prashant pansare <prashantpan_99@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Abhijit , Thanks for u r responce,it gives me lots of moral support & if u find any supporting stds.pl. mail me. Thanks & Regards, Prashant  --- On Thu, 28/5/09, abbey kangale <abhianu12@yahoo.com> wrote: From: abbey kangale <abhianu12@yahoo.com> Subject: [MW:2269] Re: Pl.Help. To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, 28 May, 2009, 3:48 PM Prashant   I am sorry to say ;their is no such ref standards available in Market which specify Quantum of Inspection Levels   At this stage you can issue Inspection reports for all valves mentioneing subject to Acceptance of selected Inspection Levels from your End User/Engineering Consultancey   You can issue Inspection report with all your observation and your Inspection Level assumptions but mention clearlycceptance by Client due to unavailbility of QAP/Inspection levels   I know this is regularly happens in India with TPI companies and they have to take thier own judgement for their Inspection and isuue Inspection reports with conditional approval.and for that your management has to agree for same .   Abhijit   --- On Thu, 5/28/09, prashant pansare <prashantpan_99@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: prashant pansare <prashantpan_99@yahoo.co.in> Subject: [MW:2267] Pl.Help. To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 1:11 PM Dear all, I' ve inspected ball & NRV ( API 6D)  valves for xyz company.QAP was not available & client also not provided extent of check,but i inspected Hydro test 100% for body & 10% foe seat & released all the valves after satisfactory results. My firm wants clarification for Why i not done 100% testing for seat also? I' ve been warned,badly as i' ve carried out inspection without QAP & taken my own decision. Is there any specs. or std. to rsolve this matter? & if available pl.forward me,so that i can responce immediately to avoid further action. Pl. help. Regards to all ...PRASHANT     Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel Click here! Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel Click here!

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---