Sunday, February 6, 2022

Re: [MW:32810] Process wise Impact test is required or not

Yes !
Welding Process wise impact testing is required- UG 84 

On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 5:31 PM Vinoth kanna <srvkanna1@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear welding Team,

Can you please , guide me if process wise impact is specifically mentioned in any ASME records and process wise Thickness range also, for impact tested coupons PQR.
Regards

Vinoth kanna
Welding Engineer I GPS Oman

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CADbO-YaJ3f-X-t0q1p3akqpfrFSy%3DL%3DjBpd9vaLNkFj1zq8zDg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CADder3MhhXOCWDsLx0mxT1Z8btktwt%3DtTCEFFPDwpYLYSPz_rA%40mail.gmail.com.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...