Skip to main content

Welding requirements of O-Let Fittings

When is enough-enough but not too much?

 

Surveys of small-branch connections undertaken as a result of Technical Directive No. 12 have found a number of integrally reinforced branch fittings which were in service with insufficient attachment welds.

Based on the number of occurrences it is clear that a significant misunderstanding exists on how much welding is required for a complete installation of an integrally reinforced branch outlet fitting (O-Lets).

 

Investigation of the occurrences indicates that some personnel thought that as long as the weld profile exceeded the thickness of the main header, that the branch had sufficient reinforcement.

THAT IS NOT TRUE!

 

ASME B31 Series of Codes and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code set the requirements for reinforcement of branch connections and nozzles.

 

The Codes require a full penetration groove weld to the outer edge of the manufacturer's weld bevel and that the weld be properly capped.

 

Research by the Pressure Vessel Research Council has determined that not following these requirements can result in a branch connection that is susceptible to cracking at the toe of the weld.

 

The adjacent detail describes the requirements for successful welding of an integrally reinforced branch fitting.

Note that the correct weld profile has the following characteristics:

  • The fitting is welded fully, up to the outer edge of the weld bevel
  • The groove weld has a transition weld cap that provides a smooth transition to the main pipe wall.
  • The use of excessive weld metal is not allowed. A large increase in weld cross section is just as bad as not having enough weld cross section.

Following these simple "pretty is better" guidelines will ensure a branch connection weld that has the proper reinforcement for pressure retention and will provide sufficient fatigue endurance so as to not crack over the life of the installation.

 

 

Source: http://www.wermac.org/fittings/welding_weldolet_sockolet_thredolet_elbolet_nipolet_fittings.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...

The Schaeffler and Delong diagrams for predicting ferrite levels in austenitic stainless steel welds

Introduction Ferrite is important in avoiding hot cracking in during cooling from welding of austenitic stainless steels. 'Constitution diagrams' are used to predict ferrite levels from the composition by comparing the effects of austenite and ferrite stabilising elements. The Schaeffler and Delong diagrams are the original methods of predicting the phase balances in austenitic stainless steel welds. Nickel and chromium equivalents A 'nickel equivalent' is calculated for the austenite stabilising elements and a 'chromium equivalent' ferrite stabilising elements. These are used as the axes for the diagrams, which show the compositional equivalent areas where the phases austenite, ferrite, martensite (and mixtures of these) should be present. Although intended to show the phase balance of weld fillers, these diagrams can also be used to illustrate the phase balance of the 'parent' material. There are different diagrams for dif...