This is something which regularly happens in industry .
Various details are missing which are necessary to weigh out the consequences of the decision such as.
1. Engineering application whether it is static or dynamic.
2. Nature of the defect.
3.Machining stage i.e. a.Qualification for next process
b. Pre-machining c.Stage machining or d.Final machining
c. Under which condition and who has taken the decision.
d.Is there a systematic process and authority specified
in the quality manual.
e.What are the actions taken for avoiding recurrence.
f. Costs for processing and rejection at various stages
including use in service(customer-final user)
You will be able take decision based on the above details.
If you still have the problem please let me know.
vijaybuddhisagar@gmail.com
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:09:22 AM UTC-7, shaikh ahmed wrote:
-- On Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:09:22 AM UTC-7, shaikh ahmed wrote:
Dear Friends,Please suggest me .As per Our Client Inspection Test Plan , Inspection of Casting is HOLD for Us & Witness for client , but Vendor send casting for Machining without Visual Inspection. Acceptance standard is MSS SP 55 Exmple A.Let me know how to Overcome this problem ?Give a valuble suggetion.Regards,Shaikh Ahmed00918082560014
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment