Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from August, 2018

Re: [MW:28239] Regarding Combined Welding Process WPS (GTAW+SMAW)

We're it is given we can change backing .only removal is given. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

[MW:28239] Combination of welding process on wos

if two welders qualify for combination of diff welding process on separate test coupon than both welder can make welding on same joint during production? -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Re: [MW:28239] water sample parameters for hydro test

It has to be a non-flammable liquid, and also non-lethal, some customers ask in their specification that the water is free of salts and minerals, that you show by a documented laboratory test, but in general I would recommend that you review UG-99 of Section VIII DIV.1 of the BPVC ASME, in case this is your Construction Code.    Regards!  .  El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 8:03, Temburu Chiranjeevulu (< chiru.qaqc@gmail.com >) escribió: Dear Experts, What are the parameters of water sample, we have to check before hydro static test. Thanks and Best Regards, CHIRANJEEVULU T, 8790956353. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/gro...

[MW:28238] water sample parameters for hydro test

Dear Experts, What are the parameters of water sample, we have to check before hydro static test. Thanks and Best Regards, CHIRANJEEVULU T, 8790956353. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Re: [MW:28237] Tensile properties of 6010 and API 5L X70 Pipe

you can go ahead considering the hardness test . On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:18 PM 'Asif Shahzad' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote:   Dear Expert, we need to weld the API 5L X70 grade pipe and using the  electrode 6010 for root, While tensile strength  of the 6010 electrode is 430 MPa while tensile strength of X70 grade is (570 to 760)MPa. So tensile strength of 6010 is lower than x70.For hot pass, filling and capping we are using 9010. Please provide your expert opinion that we can use the electrode having low tensile strength than the base metal  and if yes kindly give the reason Regards, Asif -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups...

[MW:28236] VERTICAL SEAM CLADDING

Dear Experts, I would like to know details of Vertical Seam Cladding on Tanks. We carried out cladding  previously which was conventional method but this method we have not done. Would like to know what is  the method to carry out and how the sheets to be fabricated.  Thanks in advance. Regards, Vijay  -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Re: [MW:28235] criteria for ASTM G 28

Hi All. I have found recently total specification of "GS EP PVV 618" that say 3mm/year(ideally 1-1.2mm/year) for acceptance of G28. Now does any body know why this amount specified in spite of other documents (that mentioned .8 or .9 mm/year ) and when ideally amount applicable for setting criteria? Regards. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:10 AM < nithindsilva4u@gmail.com > wrote: Hi pls find my reply, 1. Same criteria will apply to weld and materials. We have done this test for weld as well as parent materials (Mill as well as in shop Lab) successfully and could achieve corrosion rates less than 0.8mm/year. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 24, 2018, at 17:55, Ali Asghari < asgharialigl@gmail.com > wrote: Dear Joseph. Thank you so much. I have found a reference in mentioned address web mail which have been attached. Based on this image, the acceptance criteria for 625 is 0.9 but there is two item that weaken applicability of it, at title of table said unwelded and in second ...

Re: [MW:28233] sample preparation of ASTM G28

Hi,      The sample preparation for clad materials is always debatable and should mostly be addressed by end user specification. It should be dictated from the fact that service fluid is in touch with the final clad layer and considering the corrosion allowance. However you may check the entire cross section corrosion rates for your reference. Thanks & Regards, Harish On Aug 29, 2018 12:10 PM, "Ali Asghari" < asgharialigl@gmail.com > wrote: Dear All. Does anybody have any experiences or instruction for preparation of sample for G28?is there any requirement to remove clad material from surface and go through it or not? this question arises from this point that IGC comes from carbide & inter metallics that mostly possible in diluted area and also accepted corrosion rate is about 0.9 mm/year for 625. Now is it reasonable to prepare sample from interface or without removing of thickness and take it from surface? Regards.   -- https://materials-welding.blog...

Re: [MW:28234] sample preparation of ASTM G28

Dear Harish. Thank you for responding. "The intent is to test a specimen representing as nearly as possible the material as used in service. The specimens should be cut to represent the grain flow direction that will see service, for example, specimens should not contain cross-sectional areas unless it is the intent of the test to evaluate these. Only such surface finishing should be performed as is required to remove foreign material and obtain a standard, uniform finish as specified in 6.4. For very heavy sections, specimens should be maintained to represent the appropriate surface while maintaining reasonable specimen size for convenience in testing. Ordinarily, removal of more material than necessary will have little influence on the test results." this paragraph is taken from G28 and only said about the surface area but didn't talk about any thing about cross section or through thickness orientation of sample especially for weld deposited over laid that have a metallurgic...

[MW:28232] sample preparation of ASTM G28

Dear All. Does anybody have any experiences or instruction for preparation of sample for G28?is there any requirement to remove clad material from surface and go through it or not? this question arises from this point that IGC comes from carbide & inter metallics that mostly possible in diluted area and also accepted corrosion rate is about 0.9 mm/year for 625. Now is it reasonable to prepare sample from interface or without removing of thickness and take it from surface? Regards.   -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Re: [MW:28231] HEAT INPUT Vs IMPACT

Hi, Please find attached a document on key concept regarding heat input and impact value, submitted earlier. It should clear some basic doubts.  Best Regards, Shashank C Vagal (Quality Adviser), (+91) 8082395502, 8779046302, NEO METAL-ANALYST & NDT SERVICES ·        A-25, Geet Siddhi, Boradevadi, Moshi-Haveli, PCMC, Pune 412105 ·       301, PRATHAMESH, M G Rd – Mahant Rd, Vile Parle East, Mumbai 400 057 INDIA www.neometalanalystndt.com  /  enquiry@neometalanalystndt.com  /  nach_sam@yahoo.com On Monday, 27 August, 2018, 3:29:54 PM IST, Aslam Khan <aslamkhan15@gmail.com> wrote: Heat Input(J/mm) = (Amperage x Voltage x 60)/Travel Speed Please check QW-409.1 for detail description.. On Mon 27 Aug, 20...

Re: [MW:28230] HEAT INPUT Vs IMPACT

Heat Input(J/mm) = (Amperage x Voltage x 60)/Travel Speed Please check QW-409.1 for detail description.. On Mon 27 Aug, 2018, 8:10 AM Kannayeram Gnanapandithan, < kgpandithan@gmail.com > wrote: What is the formula for calculating Heat input. Interpass temp is also important to achieve good impact values On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 8:06 am Paresh Katvi, < pkatvi@gmail.com > wrote: Not only travel speed but also selection of the welding consumables. Regards, Paresh  On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 15:31 CHITTARANJAN BHIWANDKAR, < crbhiwandkar.smspl@gmail.com > wrote: Thanks PARESH,  In other words the Impact values in MTC  can be a governing value to decide on travel speed. On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 12:36 p.m. Paresh Katvi, < pkatvi@gmail.com > wrote: Hi  In my opinion, Heat input is a crucial criteria to achieve impact values in Weld, HAZ and Parent Metal. Travel speed is one of important contributor  for determining heat input. Again it is very important , which material , thickness an...

[MW:28229] SSC of Martensite stainless steel

Dear All. Does anybody have datailed procedure for SSC testing of CRA especially for martensite stainless steel except as EFC17 ? Regards. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Re: [MW:28228] HEAT INPUT Vs IMPACT

What is the formula for calculating Heat input. Interpass temp is also important to achieve good impact values On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 8:06 am Paresh Katvi, < pkatvi@gmail.com > wrote: Not only travel speed but also selection of the welding consumables. Regards, Paresh  On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 15:31 CHITTARANJAN BHIWANDKAR, < crbhiwandkar.smspl@gmail.com > wrote: Thanks PARESH,  In other words the Impact values in MTC  can be a governing value to decide on travel speed. On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 12:36 p.m. Paresh Katvi, < pkatvi@gmail.com > wrote: Hi  In my opinion, Heat input is a crucial criteria to achieve impact values in Weld, HAZ and Parent Metal. Travel speed is one of important contributor  for determining heat input. Again it is very important , which material , thickness and welding process used for establishing heat input to achieve desired toughness property.  You need to referred your historical  records in order to judge and establish heat input parameters to achiev...

Re: [MW:28227] HEAT INPUT Vs IMPACT

Not only travel speed but also selection of the welding consumables. Regards, Paresh  On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 15:31 CHITTARANJAN BHIWANDKAR, < crbhiwandkar.smspl@gmail.com > wrote: Thanks PARESH,  In other words the Impact values in MTC  can be a governing value to decide on travel speed. On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 12:36 p.m. Paresh Katvi, < pkatvi@gmail.com > wrote: Hi  In my opinion, Heat input is a crucial criteria to achieve impact values in Weld, HAZ and Parent Metal. Travel speed is one of important contributor  for determining heat input. Again it is very important , which material , thickness and welding process used for establishing heat input to achieve desired toughness property.  You need to referred your historical  records in order to judge and establish heat input parameters to achieve particular range of impact values in given material. Regards, Paresh On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM BHIWANDKAR C R < crbhiwandkar.smspl@gmail.com > wrote: SIR, WHILE PREPARING WP...

Re: [MW:28226] Re: Tensile properties of 6010 and API 5L X70 Pipe

PLS SPECIFY DIA.& THK. OF THE PIPE Thanks/Regards, C.R.Bhiwandkar Supreme Megastructures Pvt. Ltd. Supreme House, Plot No.-49/C, Pratap Gad, Opp.-IIT Main Gate. Powai, Mumbai - 400076 Cell No.:-+919867139337 On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 4:36 PM Mohd Siraj < mohd52100@gmail.com > wrote: asif, 6010+9010 (or 9018 up hill)would be good choice, 8010 would may lead to hot cracking... On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 2:48:37 PM UTC+3, Asif Shahzad wrote:   Dear Expert, we need to weld the API 5L X70 grade pipe and using the  electrode 6010 for root, While tensile strength  of the 6010 electrode is 430 MPa while tensile strength of X70 grade is (570 to 760)MPa. So tensile strength of 6010 is lower than x70.For hot pass, filling and capping we are using 9010. Please provide your expert opinion that we can use the electrode having low tensile strength than the base metal  and if yes kindly give the reason Regards, Asif -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ htt...

[MW:28225] Re: Tensile properties of 6010 and API 5L X70 Pipe

asif, 6010+9010 (or 9018 up hill)would be good choice, 8010 would may lead to hot cracking... On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 2:48:37 PM UTC+3, Asif Shahzad wrote:   Dear Expert, we need to weld the API 5L X70 grade pipe and using the  electrode 6010 for root, While tensile strength  of the 6010 electrode is 430 MPa while tensile strength of X70 grade is (570 to 760)MPa. So tensile strength of 6010 is lower than x70.For hot pass, filling and capping we are using 9010. Please provide your expert opinion that we can use the electrode having low tensile strength than the base metal  and if yes kindly give the reason Regards, Asif -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this ...

Re: [MW:28224] HEAT INPUT Vs IMPACT

Thanks PARESH,  In other words the Impact values in MTC  can be a governing value to decide on travel speed. On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 12:36 p.m. Paresh Katvi, < pkatvi@gmail.com > wrote: Hi  In my opinion, Heat input is a crucial criteria to achieve impact values in Weld, HAZ and Parent Metal. Travel speed is one of important contributor  for determining heat input. Again it is very important , which material , thickness and welding process used for establishing heat input to achieve desired toughness property.  You need to referred your historical  records in order to judge and establish heat input parameters to achieve particular range of impact values in given material. Regards, Paresh On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM BHIWANDKAR C R < crbhiwandkar.smspl@gmail.com > wrote: SIR, WHILE PREPARING WPS THE CONSIDERATION OF  HEAT INPUT JOULES TO JOULES ON MILL T C IS REQUIRED TO BE DONE. OR THE TRAVEL SPEED CAN BE DETERMIND ON THE BASIS OF THE IMAPACT TEST VALUES GIVEN ON MILL TC ...

Re: [MW:28223] HEAT INPUT Vs IMPACT

Hi  In my opinion, Heat input is a crucial criteria to achieve impact values in Weld, HAZ and Parent Metal. Travel speed is one of important contributor  for determining heat input. Again it is very important , which material , thickness and welding process used for establishing heat input to achieve desired toughness property.  You need to referred your historical  records in order to judge and establish heat input parameters to achieve particular range of impact values in given material. Regards, Paresh On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM BHIWANDKAR C R < crbhiwandkar.smspl@gmail.com > wrote: SIR, WHILE PREPARING WPS THE CONSIDERATION OF  HEAT INPUT JOULES TO JOULES ON MILL T C IS REQUIRED TO BE DONE. OR THE TRAVEL SPEED CAN BE DETERMIND ON THE BASIS OF THE IMAPACT TEST VALUES GIVEN ON MILL TC -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials...

Re: [MW:28222] Throat Thickness in welding between DIN-18800 part 1 & EN1993 part 1

Check asme B 31.3 or 31.1 are incorporating with your requirements, if not there will be client specifications where his requirements ensured with the reference to international codes. Regards  Muneeb.  On Sat, Aug 25, 2018, 1:04 PM 'Bijay' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote: Dear Experts In one of my project I have facing problems in throat thickness of welding. Our governing code for welding is DIN - 18800 part 1, but as per clients instruction we have to follow the EN 1993 part 1 for throat thickness. I can't find anything regarding throat thickness. Please guide what to do ? Thank you in advance.   With Regards Bijay Kumar Choudhury Mob +91 8980630973 -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr...