Sunday, April 1, 2018

Re: [MW:27610] USE OF WPS

It is important that you mention under what code your WPS is written.

2018-03-31 21:25 GMT-06:00 Nachhattar Singh <nachhattar1947@gmail.com>:

Dear Experts

 

I have a WPS and PQR approved for 13% Cr. For 3.2 mm Electrode.

My question is if the same WPS can be used for use of 4.0 mm electrode.

 

If yes, then please give reference of the code / standard.

 

Kind regards  

 

N. S. Gurm

 

PLEASE THINK BEFORE PRINTING

 

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

Ing. José Juan Jiménez Alejandro

ASME Independent Consultant 

and Technical Manager SSI-TPI

Cel. +52 812 352 4606

Skype: jjjimeneza

Twitter: @jjjimeneza



--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...