Friday, January 1, 2016

Re: [MW:24028] Welder Qualification as per ASME SEC IX

Hi,

Can that welder be checked for any documentation for the similar works after he left the organisation. I mean that welder might have been working in different organisation but what if he/she had been working with the same welding parameters (this is just to say about his consistency in welding) and these documents are available?

Can that welder be waived off to re-qualify based on these documents as this will prove his consistency. 



On 28 December 2015 at 10:00, 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Dear Azam,

Welder Qualification shall be performed by each Qualifying Organisation according to ASME Sec.IX.

Yes the previous Qualification made by the X welder before leaving the organisation will be valid by qualifying a single test coupon for that process.
 
Thanks & Regards
J.Gerald Jayakumar
0091-9344954677




From: Mohd Azam <azam1976@gmail.com>
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 5:48 PM
Subject: [MW:24008] Welder Qualification as per ASME SEC IX

Dear Expert,
"X" welder working with company and left the organization. Again after Two or three year he is joining back same company. All earlier certificate is available with company with proper documentation.
 
Is it possible to renew his earlier certificate with one sample based on RT or visual inspection OR All new qualification is to be done New. Qualification code is ASME SEC IX.
 
Pls provide your valuable input with standard reference.
 
Thanks & Regards,
Mohd. Azam
Doha-Qatar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CABD%2BRXSMVhvN0Fje56BbuQb6V3KSYO%3Dz17%2BLtshZO1u3Vt%2Bkhg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/534889103.3167229.1451277057695.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Thanks & Regards,

A Bharat Kumar
+91 9989717650

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAFPbJeYV6ZhijTfrqt9fp2viY4kSja%3Dx7nxVOe_WF7TZMLu1Nw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...