can see it clearly that components, and thickness of weld is a
identification system as requested by the procedure submitted by our
NDE company.
Rgds
2011/12/22, Ramchandra vichare <vicharerke@indiatimes.com>:
> Dear Experts,
>
> During Interpreting Radiography films at one of my vendor's works, I
> observed that, there is no identification /indicate thickness of job on film
> so I rejected the film. As far as generally everyone related field
> experience persons are know unless identification of thickness on film it is
> very difficult to know which penetrameter to be used but my vendor is
> arguing for the same. According to him one of "Level III" person insisit
> them there is no need to mentioned thickness in Radiography films and it
> sufficient if it indicate in Radiography interpretion report.
> Suppose in piping number of joints/piping spools are comming with verious
> thickness in same report in such case it is possible to identify required
> penetrameter ? My anser is no, each Radiography films must be indicat
> thickness of joint/job. Requested to suggest/advise.
>
> Sincerely yours,
> RK Vichare
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group's bolg at
> http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
> The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
> meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
> w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
>
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment