Monday, March 1, 2010

[MW:4399] RE: 4393] RE: Failure of PQR in All Weld Tensile

Since your coupon is in the 6G position, is there a possibility that your welder is exceeding heat input by ‘weaving’ during the fill passes? 

 

From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of prashant pansare
Sent: February-26-10 11:05 PM
To: RojiAbraham; mat wel
Cc: par kat; sol grea
Subject: [MW:4393] RE: Failure of PQR in All Weld Tensile

 

Roji (Guru),

U r correct, but I m intrested in UTS & also I got all weld tensile values @ 549 / 567 Mpa in main welding procedure & 545 / 525 Mpa in Partial Repar procedure with the same electrode. Is there any effect of welding at the same position two times while Thru Thk. re-repair.

Pl. reply

PSP

--- On Fri, 26/2/10, Abraham, Roji <Roji.Abraham@bg-group.com> wrote:


From: Abraham, Roji <Roji.Abraham@bg-group.com>
Subject: RE: Failure of PQR in All Weld Tensile
To: "prashant pansare" <prashantpan_99@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: "Katvi, Paresh" <Paresh.Katvi@bg-group.com>, "sol grea" <solutions.great@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, 26 February, 2010, 2:25 PM

Prashant .

 

Why r u using DNV OS F101 2000 INSTEAD OF 2007.

 

1.       Verify that the Yield stress of the weld metal is more than 80 Mpa  than the SMYS of the base material.  Check Appendix- C page 167 C302 , where it states that the YS of the metal should be minimum 80 MPA above the SMYS of the base material.  

 

If YS of electrode  is not more than the  base material then the selection of the electrode is incorrect.

 

2.       Also verify what’s the all weld tensile value you have got for the  electrode specified in the electrode MTC.

 

 

Rdgs

Roji

 

 

From: prashant pansare [mailto:prashantpan_99@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:39 PM
To: mat wel
Cc: Katvi, Paresh; Abraham, Roji
Subject: Failure of PQR in All Weld Tensile

 

Dear All,

We are working on PQR & deatails are as folows :

Appl. Code - DNV OS F101,2000

PQR - Through THickness Repair. (SMAW)

Base Metal - API 5L X GRADE 60 - 12.75" OD X 14.3 mm THK.

Filler Metal - E-7018 H4R

Position -6G

After mechanical tests, we are getting all values in acceptable limits except All Weld Tensile results.(Reqd- 517 Mpa & Actual - 483 / 493 Mpa)

What is the reason & solution for the same?

Pl. reply.

PSP  

 


Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

______________________________________________________________________
BG Energy Holdings Limited
Registered in England & Wales No: 3763515 Registered address:
100 Thames Valley Park Drive
Reading, Berkshire RG6 1PT UK
Telephone: +44 (0)118 935 3222
Website: http://www.BG-Group.com
 
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. As this
e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, please advise
us immediately if you are not the named addressee or the person
responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee and
delete all copies from your system. The contents should not be
disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. If the content of this
email or attachment is personal or unconnected with our business, BG
Energy Holdings Limited accepts no liability or responsibility for it.
Please also note that we make every effort to keep our network free
from viruses and this email has been scanned accordingly. BG Energy
Holdings Limited accepts no responsibility for viruses once an email has
been transmitted.

 


Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...