Wednesday, March 31, 2010

[MW:4638] RE: 4637] SA965/SA788

My opinion, yes: refer 16.1.3.1 of SA788
Reference to Specification A 788/A 788M including the year date together
with the applicable revision letter, if any, of the revision used shall
be a part of the certification.

-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
[mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of qaqcmpm
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 9:20 AM
To: Materials & Welding
Subject: [MW:4637] SA965/SA788

while reviewing the MTC for SA965, it states

3.2 Material supplied to this specification shall conform to the
requirements of Specification A 788

If the MTC does not have mentioned SA788, is it a non conformance?

Filtered by Hosted Filtering


--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35241] Overlay welding defects

Dear Sir, The below is another type of defect,Mostly these two type of defects we faced. Regards, R.Gowtham. On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:42 PM...