Thursday, August 1, 2019

Re: [MW:29910] Impact testing as per ASME B31.3

Can you pls give reference for qualification thickness in this case



On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, 09:25 Sudhakar Kuppuswamy, <mechsudhakar@gmail.com> wrote:

In my opinion, for the below stated conditions, as per ASME B31.3, Impact test is applicable. I.e. supplementary essential variables for ASME Section 09 becomes essential variables. 

And, the qualified WPS thickness shall be T/2 to T+6mm, i.e. 8.74 mm to 23.48 mm in your case.


Regards,

Sudhakar K

Welding Engineer 




On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:24 AM Babur Khan <mbabur.bwp@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear experts, 
Please clarify for impact test requirements of below variables.
Construction code ASME B31.3
Material A106 Gr. B
The thickness of Pipe. 17.48 mm
Temperature Limit 0^ F (-17.78^ C)
PWHT yes.
Table A-1 refers to curve B
Table 323.2.2A minimum Temperature without Impact Testing for CS showing under curve B 9^ F ( 12.8^ C).
My Question is for above case Impact testing for WPS qualification is required?  

Regards,

Muhammad Babur Khan Lashari
Sr. QA/QC Inspector (Welding)

(CSWIP 3.1 / CWI II From PWI) 

Mob: + 966 58 2774568 / 050 5193275

PAK : + 92 334 6186285 (Whatsapp)

Skype: babur.lashari

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAN53wK1Vs8CgXP0uzAFyPAUNQ-gbaeg7axU9zRQZsXhV9p19jg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CA%2BfZfcPjTGp6RdR8Q_-4Q%2B_AxS3cG4_scXWH2m-b3fW-5apgzg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAB%3DAs8ko-s%3DXUi90qaiSkw43p_dXnuWxb7k1oom%3DhxNtfFkhRQ%40mail.gmail.com.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...